Completely agreed. I couldn't care less about $1 in 2025, but if I have an ~5% forward yield and it's able to continue to grow at double digits for 5-10 years, I find that pretty attractive. At least for an alt asset manager. I'm a pretty big fan of the OWL business model and the emphasis on FRE over carry, and I think this should help it trade at a higher multiple.
The most comparable models are BX, BAM, and ARES. And ARES is the most comparable in terms of emphasis on private credit. All of these trade at a richer value, have lower growth, and lower dividend yields than OWL. I'd expect that if OWL avoid a major misstep that this valuation gap will likely close over a period of time, and hopefully will be earning significantly higher FRE/dividends in 3-5 years.
Obviously I love APO/KKR/BX/ARES, but I really think OWL has the most upside at these levels.
EDIT:
Just pointing out that all of the major alts (APO, BX, KKR, BAM, CG, ARES, etc.) have made deals to manage insurance AUM, and it appears that OWL is trying to break into the market as well. I think the smaller scale of OWL sets up some really great growth tailwinds as it won't take nearly as much to move the needle in increasing AUM/FRE/DE.
Also, I'm not normally a huge believer in empire builders, but I'm excited about all the tuck in acquisitions that OWL has been pulling off to scale up its credit business. Also I love the general partner business, and I think this has helped OWL identify attractive acquisition targets in addition to being a great source of FRE in itself.