Jump to content

TonyG

Member
  • Posts

    140
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TonyG

  1. Ya i almost didn't post the question because I didn't want to really speculate but nonetheless thanks for the answers
  2. If it was a simple affirm of Lamberth, would the court of appeals be taking this long? I ask because I'm reminded of when hamish hume said " the longer they take to make a decision, the better it is for us.."
  3. I believe he did. Also, i think more documents were unsealed http://fanniefreddiesecrets.org/resources/ Haven't read them yet.
  4. Have we seen that presentation in the second set of documents by David Benson the "Strategic Planning Session?"
  5. Wow. Now how long is it going to take to get another judge up to speed?
  6. Can't he just sell his shares. It's like $32. Is there any way defendants can try to stall and get a new judge?
  7. I can understand Corker investing in them (being the former mayor of Chattanooga and from Tennessee) but how does a senator from Virginia just happen to be invested in the same fund as bob corker and they both just happen to be on housing, finance committee? Seems like more than just a coincidence
  8. if delawre rules illegal, I assume gov't can't appeal that right? because they plan on submitting it to supreme court of delaware?
  9. what gets me is why are these members of congress now writing to watt? the nws has been in place for almost 4 years. what took so long? or is it because this is now coming out of the shadows and they don't want to look bad? or those damn hedge fund lobbyists?
  10. With these new emails, and with common and preferred barely reacting, curious if anyones adding or is everyone already maxed out?
  11. Did sweeney unseal more docs? ?http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/22/business/how-freddie-and-fannie-are-held-captive.html?ref=business
  12. question for the lawyers, if the mdl panel chooses not to consolidate hindes/jacobs, how fast does that come to a decision being that, i believe, they are fully briefed?
  13. I'm going to second that merk. Very odd and interesting all these articles about the same thing past two days. Btw i saw a tweet by tim pagliara the other day saying corker is meeting ackman in a couple weeks (corker was on cnbc that morning). Anyone see that?
  14. If remanded for further fact finding, whats your best estimate of how long that would take?
  15. Going back on plaintiffs filing a judicial notice for court of appeals regarding watt and fnma ceo saying they need capital, what would be stopping plaintiffs from filing that?
  16. I used to be so bothered by what carney wrote but now ive just come to accept it. It is certainly odd and frustrating how vocal he is about it. Cherzeca, The ceo AND the conservator himself have now said that.im not advocating everyone email perry attorneys, but cant someone let them know? What would be their reasons for not doing so?
  17. Also he said Ackman on his CC said that Corker's Jumpstart bill was a head fake but Corker said he disagreed and explained why he thinks Congress should fix the issue and even extend the jumpstart bill regarding f and f even further
  18. Just that ackman has not lobbied ever for Fannie R&R. And that Corker and Ackman would like to discuss fannie and freddie and ackman said he would love to stop by and explain it to him
  19. Watching that. He used his whole time to talk about fannie and freddie essentially lol.
×
×
  • Create New...