onyx1

So what kind of pneumonia allows someone to fully recover 90 minutes after a collapse? This medical expert believes it's hogwash and the facts support her having Parkinsons. If true, I think we can all agree she is disqualified. Will she admit it? Not on a chance. It's got to be painful to be a democrat and watch this train wreck. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-13/medical-doctor-explains-why-hillarys-911-medical-episode-looks-more-parkinsons-pneum

Scott Adams this morning: "The election is over."

To me, it's not funny to expose an innocent child to an infectious disease. Nice try. If you can't respond to the message, attack the messenger.

Pretty sure the parents of this girl are re-considering their vote for Pneumonia Hillary. http://www.theamericanmirror.com/hillary-hugs-child-despite-contagious-pneumonia/

Watch MSNBC twist themselves into a knot to cover for Hillary. They don't mention that a barricade was needed to hold her up, call her "a little bit wobbly", due to the "horrible" heat, and carefully edit the video to keep from showing her fainting. Hilarious. BTW, I live in the area, and it wasn't even hot today. 82 degrees with moderate humidity and a steady breeze. Media corruption.

Did you say facts? and then you post from Fox News.You have a lot to learn about this country my friend. Fox news is as real as WWF. Again its Clinton vs brain dead scumbag traitor who goes on foreign news channel and criticize our President. Facts? Here you go. Is a video good enough fact? https://twitter.com/zgazda66/status/774993814025011200 No, video won't be enough. The loony leftists will fall for the coming explanation that she just "tripped".

Then they add you're a heartless child-killer to suggest shutting down the Clinton Foundation. http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/292323-carville-shutting-down-clinton-foundation-would-kill

Because Trump says mean things!

If these 50 were so good at seeing into the future, why did they invade Iraq?

Further evidence the playbook is working.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/08/05/how-paul-krugman-made-donald-trump-possible.html It's the same, tired, old playbook used for decades. Remember Ronald Reagan the "Warmonger"? And they will keep using it as long as it works on the young and the gullible. Here's the 2016 version:

It only looks like ransom because it was $400mm in unmarked currency on a pallet delivered from an unmarked plane in the middle of the night!

It's not the Trump supporters who are comparing him to Hitler.

Do you (a) genuinely admire Trump and see him as the right sort of leader who would be a good POTUS or (b) are you supporting him holding your nose, because you dislike Mrs. Clinton? If (a), what do you admire about him? If (b), what are some things that he can do that would turn you off from voting for him? Not trying to make a point or anything of that sort, I am trying to understand your point of view. Vinod Vinod1: Before I respond, lets agree that there is zero chance either of us will change the others minds. OK? But since you asked: Generally (b), I draw the line at candidates who exhibit a strong inference of serious criminal behavior. Regarding Trump. He has negatives, but I find the positives things he can do on important matters to far outweigh them. He is far more likely to: respect the rule of law, deal with the threats to this country directly, understand the importance of the free enterprise system and the capitalists who simply want to operate without regulatory overburden, nominate supreme court justices that lean constitutionalist, secure the border, unhinge the corrosive PC culture, make other unpopular decisions as he is not corrupted by the donor class. Will he be the "right sort of leader"? Probably not in the traditional sense, but I'm more interested in getting things done than following a playbook.

"The Republican nominee is unfit to serve as president" -- Obama, 8/2/2016 Should Obama impose martial law protect the country in the event of Trump's victory?

Let me teach you a new word: Dunning-Kruger. Great observation. Explains many of the posters here in their twenty's, possessing little life experience, yet are extremely sure of themselves.

Under what legal authority would this be allowed?

What does this have to do with any ruling by any court? Even if you win, you just get paper - not cash. And if you can actually sell it - its at cents on the $ SD If I expect the UST defease my 6.4% coupon to perpetuity, I won't let it go for cents on the dollar. Neither will anyone else, because it will be worth 160% of par at a 4% government rate.

The first step to clarity here is to understand that reasoning plays no part in making a personal political choice. Political choices are made early in life. Emotions and the way we individually view the world play a large part. With a pre-determined political choice in hand, we all seek out facts to confirm the decision that we have already made. When we run into contrary facts we ignored them, or reason them away. That is why trying to change someone's political views with logic is impossible, and message forums like this one are so ineffective. However, moving someone's political views to the left or right is possible. But it can only work with appeals to emotion. One of the two current candidates is a master at this, the other is awful.

Trumps unpredictability is scary stuff...to our enemies. And the world will be a safer place because of it. Obama's predictable pacifism, like post WWI Europe's, might feel good to a war-weary populace, but it's an illusion. Pacifism gives tyrants an easy opportunity to expand their empires. WOW! Yes, questioning America's commitment to NATO scares the crap out of our enemies. Maybe yes, maybe no. But you can be sure the NATO dues checks won't be late!

Trumps unpredictability is scary stuff...to our enemies. And the world will be a safer place because of it. Obama's predictable pacifism, like post WWI Europe's, might feel good to a war-weary populace, but it's an illusion. Pacifism gives tyrants an easy opportunity to expand their empires.

The two bills in the bottom right hand corner form a cross. Trump clearly hates Christians too!

I'd like to know from Comey what is the difference between "extremely careless" and "gross negligence". When top officials rewrite law like Comey just did, it provides clearance for other to do the same. This is the biggest risk to the GSE investment thesis.

Here's a business failure to fixate on: Whitewater Development Corp., Hillary's bankruptcy that sent 15 people to jail. There is some argument to be made that Bill & Hillary are MUCH better businesspeople than Mr. Trump. Look at how much money they've made since leaving the Whitehouse. Remember, they claimed that they were "dead broke" when they left. Now look at them! They are worth billions. Further, how much capital did they need to get that money? Almost nothing! No buildings, no factories, no huge amounts of inventory or R&D. All they've needed are a few handlers/secretaries, private jets, servers, cell phones and private jets. An absolute incredible return on assets... At this point in time, Mr. Trump is likely richer than the Clinton's...but the Clintons should easily surpass Mr./ Trump's wealth, ESPECIALLY if Hillary is elected and stays out of jail. Bill charged 750k for an hour long speech when Hillary was Secretary of State. What will he get when she is President?

Here's a business failure to fixate on: Whitewater Development Corp., Hillary's bankruptcy that sent 15 people to jail.