thecynic Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 This link proving that sum of natural numbers i.e. 1 + 2 + 3 + .. = -1/12 was posted to my twitter feed. I figured many here would find it interesting as well: Apparently the result is used a lot in modern physics. This definitely undermines my faith in theoretical physicists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hielko Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Assuming I understood the video correctly this kind of math is also used to explain the casimir effect, and other quantum mechanics related stuff. That's not theoretical physics anymore, but actually phenomena that have been measured and proven. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randomep Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 I didn't have the patience to sit through the video but what if I can prove that the result is infinity, then who is right? Anyway, my point here is actually that now I have that much more respect for Jeff Gundlach; I read that he dropped out of his mathematics PhD program because he wanted to prove infinity doesn't exist. OMG could he be right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecynic Posted January 18, 2014 Author Share Posted January 18, 2014 That's not theoretical physics anymore, but actually phenomena that have been measured and proven. You are right. Perhaps the universe is so strange that strange results are needed to make sense of it. Maybe we'll have some theories in future which don't have to rely on positive numbers adding up to a negative number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericd1 Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 I think with a little online checking you will find there's an error in the math. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecynic Posted January 18, 2014 Author Share Posted January 18, 2014 I didn't have the patience to sit through the video but what if I can prove that the result is infinity, then who is right? Anyway, my point here is actually that now I have that much more respect for Jeff Gundlach; I read that he dropped out of his mathematics PhD program because he wanted to prove infinity doesn't exist. OMG could he be right? According to wikipedia the self taught number theory genius Ramanujam http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1_%2B_2_%2B_3_%2B_4_%2B_%E2%8B%AF also thought the sum was -1/12. I'm thinking that one can prove the sum is infinity or -1/12 depending on different assumptions. I am not a mathematician but I do not trust the analytic continuation step which is key to the result in the video. If there is no infinity how would that change our understanding of the world? I guess that'd make for a good dissertation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
constructive Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 It's not regular summation - the addition and equals sign here are misleading since they don't mean regular addition and regular equals. It's Ramanujan summation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramanujan_summation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecynic Posted January 18, 2014 Author Share Posted January 18, 2014 I think with a little online checking you will find there's an error in the math. :) Before I saw the video I thought the proof was going to be a complete leaky one involving cancelling infinities on both sides of the equation. But I did some online checking and found but the result is still good and accepted by many of the physicists/mathematicians: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/633285/is-the-sum-of-all-natural-numbers-frac112 Apparently, the result is ok because it can be used explain observed physical phenomenon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecynic Posted January 18, 2014 Author Share Posted January 18, 2014 It's not regular summation - the addition and equals sign here are misleading since they don't mean regular addition and regular equals. It's Ramanujan summation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramanujan_summation Thanks, very interesting. Perhaps that's what I'm missing, the original result is just too bizarre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnpane Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 This summation has very useful applications to representing risk in investing. The left hand side represents diligent savings of pennies over a lifetime, and the right hand side represents accumulated wealth after a market crash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now