Alekbaylee Posted September 18, 2012 Posted September 18, 2012 Interesting, although nothing new and the journalist makes a few mistakes with the numbers. http://www.investmentnews.com/article/20120918/BLOG06/120919939
Olmsted Posted September 18, 2012 Posted September 18, 2012 Thanks for posting! Regarding AIG: This doesn't include any expectation of the stock returning to a mid-single-digit multiple of book value, a level at which the company has traded at in the past. A bit aggressive, no? I take it this is the author's commentary and not anything B2 would discuss.
racemize Posted September 18, 2012 Posted September 18, 2012 Thanks for posting! Regarding AIG: This doesn't include any expectation of the stock returning to a mid-single-digit multiple of book value, a level at which the company has traded at in the past. A bit aggressive, no? I take it this is the author's commentary and not anything B2 would discuss. I agree--I'm not sure we get those book multiples given how much simpler/smaller AIG is/will be.
mysticdrew Posted September 18, 2012 Posted September 18, 2012 Thanks for posting! Regarding AIG: This doesn't include any expectation of the stock returning to a mid-single-digit multiple of book value, a level at which the company has traded at in the past. A bit aggressive, no? I take it this is the author's commentary and not anything B2 would discuss. I agree--I'm not sure we get those book multiples given how much simpler/smaller AIG is/will be. Agreed it is probably aggressive from a valuation and margin of safety investing standpoint... but then again who's to say it won't become overvalued one day at multiples to book. This is Mr. Market we are talking about and it tends to go in extremes in both ways.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now