ValueBuff Posted April 16, 2009 Posted April 16, 2009 Would people put a limit on how much FFH they own as a % of overall holdings? if so, what are you comfortable with? thanks!
UhuruPeak Posted April 16, 2009 Posted April 16, 2009 FFH as a % to what? "general holdings", "investable assets", "net worth", non-401(k) investments.... Depending on what you count, FFH is probably between 30% and 80% for me (and I am way too lazy to actually calculate); it will go higher if BRK does well before the summer as I sell it and reinvest at least part in FFH. I basically view Fairfax and more risky short term but ulimately more profitable than my "same as cash" Berkshire. PS: No, I am not the ultimate nut in here, some do over 100% of investable assets through leverage :)
Viking Posted April 16, 2009 Posted April 16, 2009 My weightings have varied from 90% to 0%. When the stock fell to $220 18 months ago and it was positioned so well with its CDS and long US treasury positions I backed up the truck and moved to 90%. I went to a similar weighting a couple of years ago when it fell to just over $100. I also reduced my position to 0% each time after purchase the stock went up significantly (as fears proved false or investment results smoked). I have never planned to go so heavy. And I got VERY lucky in that the bottoms were temporary and the stock made very significant moves upwards shortly thereafter. My net worth is now large enough that I do not want to take on the additional risk of concentrating on one company. Currently I have about 12% in FFH (of my investable assets) with my avg purchase being about CAN$285 (I was at 0% at the start of the year). On a go forward basis I doubt that FFH will trade as cheaply as it has in the past. I will be happy to buy when it falls below 0.8 x BV but will limit my exposure (perhaps 25%). I will also continue to lighten up as the stock appreciates... I like the company alot and feel it will perform quite well looking out 3 to 5 years. And the results will be lumpy. I will get more excited about FFH once the insurance market begins to harden...
UhuruPeak Posted April 16, 2009 Posted April 16, 2009 jeez Viking, you've been smoking good! While I did a couple of round trips as well, I didn't do anywhere near as well as you seem to have (or uccmal/ericopoly/others have done with the leaps). I should really go back to looking at the Joe/Jane 6pack investors who lose their shirt in the market to make myself feel better in comparison ;D
Viking Posted April 16, 2009 Posted April 16, 2009 Uruhu, I should point out that FFH gains over the years have covered up a number of smaller losses (although my long return is about 18%). Also, with FFH, I never went from zero to 90% on one purchase. I always started buying when the stock looked cheap and as it kept going lower I always bought more. And when it got insanely cheap (i.e. $100 a couple of years ago) I went pretty much all in. If FFH went under at the same time the stock price was cratering I would have been pretty much cleaned out. Also, during the short periods when I was 'all in' it was very difficult for me to keep things together mentally. High risk... high reward. Gambling? Stupid? I do not have the answers. Bottom line, I have learned that I do have a predisposition to do something that is quite dangerous (go overweight). I am trying to get better at getting a little more diversified but not too much (as I believe concentrated portfolios are the best way to go). And despite having a pretty good long term track record I still am not sure if it is skill or luck! I just try and keep reading and learning and getting a little better every year...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now