Guest kumar Posted June 21, 2010 Share Posted June 21, 2010 http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/berkshire-to-buy-agency-licence-in-india/98591/on ....Berkshire subsidiary in India would sell motor insurance online and make investments of about Rs 50 crore ($11 million) to set up a support structure, including a call centre.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenville Posted June 21, 2010 Share Posted June 21, 2010 Very interesting. Thanks for posting! A little more color on the investment: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/personal-finance/insurance/insurance-news/Buffett-takes-agency-route-to-enter-Indian-insurance/articleshow/6072882.cms "According to sources, Berkshire is using this route because the low foreign direct investment limits in all other insurance business make it unattractive to the US giant. Whether it is life or general insurance or even insurance broking, current regulations do not permit foreign investors to hold more than 26% equity stake in the business. Corporate agency is, however, an exception. Under current regulations, any entity, including a foreign bank or any foreign-owned finance company can become an insurance agent by acquiring a corporate licence. A corporate agency, however, has its limitations. For one, every individual selling insurance in a corporate agency firm has to undergo training. Secondly, the agency can sell products for only one company. A corporate agency can, however, look forward to decent margins with commissions going up to 15% of the premium amount. " I'm curious about the corporate agency route vs the route Fairfax has taken with ICICI Lombard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldye Posted June 21, 2010 Share Posted June 21, 2010 Hopefully this will boost interest in developing India's insurance markets and potentially get the authorities to change the rules to allow up to 49% foreign ownership! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodstove Posted June 21, 2010 Share Posted June 21, 2010 Managing business risk, suggests sticking with 26 pct, and not pushing for 49 pct. The latter has political risk, as winds shift. The former is reasonable participation, plenty of profit, it's a huge country developing rapidly. India does not want colonial rule in whatever guise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffeteer Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 Credit default swaps on marriages as the costs per family and dowry costs are outrageous! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now