Sloanes Teddy Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 57 minutes ago, cubsfan said: More on the demand shock caused by Illegal immigration - direct from the Federal Reserve: https://thefederalist.com/2026/06/30/fed-study-illegal-immigration-caused-30-of-home-price-spikes-while-deflating-american-wages/ The authors discovered that for every 1 percent increase in illegal immigration “equal to 1% of a local area’s initial employment,” home prices increased by 2.2 percent, rent grew by 1.4 percent, and wages decreased by 0.87 percent, and 0.7 for the average American. This means illegal immigration is responsible for “about 30% of the total growth in house prices and 20% of total growth in rents over the boom period for the average local market.” In sum native working-class renters faced decreasing wages as illegal aliens flooded into the job market, and they also took the brunt of the housing cost increase as demand for apartments and multi-family housing grew. Every home I've purchased i found myself in a bidding war with illegal immigrants.
Spekulatius Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 6 minutes ago, Sloanes Teddy said: Every home I've purchased i found myself in a bidding war with illegal immigrants. How do you know who you bid against? Also, how do illegal immigrants buy houses when they can’t get a mortgage? I had to show my green card to get a mortgage years ago. Illegal immigrants tend to rent. Edited 1 hour ago by Spekulatius
cubsfan Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 23 minutes ago, DooDiligence said: alt righties tend to lie. Geez Doo - just tell the truth - you can't even read. Just like you to shit all over a Federal Reserve Study on home buying.... What a loser. I mean, really , how hard is this to understand. Rent prices and housing prices have always been closely correlated. You have a demand shock on rents (millions of immigrants) and you put upward pressure on housing. Econ 101 Edited 1 hour ago by cubsfan
Sloanes Teddy Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 33 minutes ago, Spekulatius said: How do you know who you bid against? Also, how do illegal immigrants buy houses when they can’t get a mortgage? I had to show my green card to get a mortgage years ago. Illegal immigrants tend to rent. I was kidding because it's ridiculous.
Maverick47 Posted 8 minutes ago Posted 8 minutes ago 1 hour ago, Red Lion said: These are great points, but on the flip side and maybe this partially explains the push to build bigger homes, it costs a lot more per square foot to build a smaller square footage home, which is one reason I don't think we are cranking out 1,200 square foot homes. I've run the numbers a few times on building ADUs in the 800-1200 square foot range to rent out, and it doesn't make a lot of sense when you can buy an existing house on a separate APN# for a similar cost. Some of this could be California specific, but no matter where you build, you're going to be sinking the most money on kitchens/bathrooms/adhering to modern building codes/utility hookups/permits, so building a home 25-50% larger doesn't increase the price by nearly 25-50%. Really interesting point about open floorplans, I hadn't considered that before. You’re exactly right. Land costs where I live are enough that when an existing small home from the 1940’s came on the market down the street it sold for $740,000. I would never want to live in a 1300 sq ft 80 year old home for that price. Zoning where I live would allow six units to be built on the same 5500 sq ft lot. The developer that bought it will build 4 three story homes with enough space left on the lot so each unit will get a one car garage. A six unit build wouldn’t have left enough space for each unit to have a garage. I don’t think a million dollar buyer would appreciate not having a garage. In any event, each of the four small skinny homes will list for over $1 million with over 2000 sq ft of living space, multiple bathrooms and a garage for each compared to the $740,000 run down home of 1300 sq ft with a carport that existed before. Housing supply will increase, but each new dwelling will be newer, nicer, larger and more expensive than the single home that existed before. I can’t think of any economics that would motivate a developer to build less expensive units in such a situation. Absent some sort of costly governmental subsidization of low cost housing, the affordability issue is a tough nut to crack.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now