Political Posts

[cubsfan]

29 minutes ago, rogermunibond said:

 

LOL

 

Nothing like 2 days of continuous bombing to get the Iranians to "chicken out"...

[Eng12345]

Interesting we can pay reparations to Iran 

[RichardGibbons]

53 minutes ago, Eng12345 said:

Interesting we can pay reparations to Iran 

 

Yeah, Obama's looking pretty amazing right now--got a much better deal and didn't waste hundreds of billions of dollars and thousands of lives to do it.

[RichardGibbons]

5 hours ago, 73 Reds said:

Iran doesn't know that because we haven't tried to put boots on the ground and we can either wait them out longer than they can survive or we can destroy their infrastructure.  Just because we haven't done so doesn't mean it can't be done.  Israel is also quite capable of destroying their infrastructure as a kind of US proxy.  Iran knows all about proxies.  

 

So, if that's the case either:

 

1. All these options are likely to have much worse outcomes for the USA than the one Trump chose, or

2. Trump made a stupid decision signing this deal because he could've just done what you said.

What scenario are you saying that we're in, #1 or #2?

[73 Reds]

1 hour ago, RichardGibbons said:

 

So, if that's the case either:

 

1. All these options are likely to have much worse outcomes for the USA than the one Trump chose, or

2. Trump made a stupid decision signing this deal because he could've just done what you said.

What scenario are you saying that we're in, #1 or #2?

Why does one need to pick either option or a "winner" or "loser" while negotiations have barely begun?  You choose to view the issue from the POV of Trump - again not sure why.  From Iran's POV - the one that matters, they either survive for a while or longer, or they don't.  Don't know which one is better for the current regime operators or the country at large.  We'll see.

[RichardGibbons]

16 minutes ago, 73 Reds said:

Why does one need to pick either option or a "winner" or "loser" while negotiations have barely begun?  You choose to view the issue from the POV of Trump - again not sure why.  From Iran's POV - the one that matters, they either survive for a while or longer, or they don't.  Don't know which one is better for the current regime operators or the country at large.  We'll see.

 

I focused on Trump because I assumed you were American and cared mostly about a good outcome for America, since you're talking (trumpeting?) all the different ways that America can hurt Iranians.

 

That said, I think I get it. You really don't want to make a decision between the two options because the first option means Trump is right but what you said earlier is wrong, or at best irrelevant, and the second option means what you said earlier is relevant, but Trump is too stupid to see it. Both scenarios are pretty intolerable to you, so it's a very good idea to avoid the question.

[73 Reds]

21 minutes ago, RichardGibbons said:

 

I focused on Trump because I assumed you were American and cared mostly about a good outcome for America, since you're talking (trumpeting?) all the different ways that America can hurt Iranians.

 

That said, I think I get it. You really don't want to make a decision between the two options because the first option means Trump is right but what you said earlier is wrong, or at best irrelevant, and the second option means what you said earlier is relevant, but Trump is too stupid to see it. Both scenarios are pretty intolerable to you, so it's a very good idea to avoid the question.

You focus on Trump, I focus on the Country and the World.  There is no decision to be made because this entire conflict has yet to play out in the minds of anyone who cares about more than how it involves Trump.  The winners could be the Iranian people and the entire Middle East region under the right circumstances.  That is my hope.

[RichardGibbons]

10 minutes ago, 73 Reds said:

You focus on Trump, I focus on the Country and the World.

 

Come on, you do not. We've read the thread, and there's probably 150 posts from you that show this isn't true.

My position is that, based on the evidence available at the time, it was a good decision to attack Iran, and was probably necessary after the mistakes Trump made during term one. The net outcome ended up being quite bad for the USA and it's unclear to me if the outcomes will be good or bad for the world.

[73 Reds]

8 minutes ago, RichardGibbons said:

 

Come on, you do not. We've read the thread, and there's probably 150 posts from you that show this isn't true.

My position is that, based on the evidence available at the time, it was a good decision to attack Iran, and was probably necessary after the mistakes Trump made during term one. The net outcome ended up being quite bad for the USA and it's unclear to me if the outcomes will be good or bad for the world.

The mistakes were made by Obama.  Nothing but a stronger Iranian threat was a feasible outcome under that deal.  Today, a much better outcome is at least possible.  No thanks to anyone but the US and Israel.