twacowfca Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 Charlie Munger says (only a little bit tongue in cheek IMHO) that Bill Gates should be BRK's chief investment officer (as a humorous comment about Gates spotting the change in railroads' ROC before Buffett did. Could this not be a Freudian slip? Who better than Gates, BRK's future to be largest shareholder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsad Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 Don't bet your life on it. More likely Gate's CIO Michael Larson would be a prime candidate. Although Gate's would make the perfect Chairman for the company. Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twacowfca Posted November 19, 2009 Author Share Posted November 19, 2009 Chairman, Schmairman. What's in a name? When Harry Truman became President, he said, "The buck stops here!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExpectedValue Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 I always thought that Klarman would be an ideal CIO. He really has a good ability to avert risk taking and build cash when things get overheated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finetrader Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 I've always thought that Bruce Berkowitz would be considered for this job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StubbleJumper Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 You missed "the name' Prem Watsa. The only problem is that Prem must already be a billionaire.....how much would you have to pay somebody who is already a billionaire? Thank god that Brian Bradstreet is not already a billionaire, because we could not afford to be without him! SJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsad Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 I think Buffett already said, that the compensation of the potential CIO's if they worked for Berkshire, is nothing compared to what they are already earning, and that their net worths are already substantial. Thus they are doing it for the right to work at Berkshire, not to make money from Berkshire. I'm guessing Brian Bradstreet et al at Hamblin-Watsa are doing it for the same reasons, since any of them could have gone out on their own a long-time ago and started hedge funds or private equity firms. Friggin' Sam Mitchell sold his stake in Marshfield Associates and decided to work at Hamblin-Watsa as a principal. That should tell people something! Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now