yadayada Posted February 4, 2015 Author Share Posted February 4, 2015 if you look at GDP correlation it seems looking at it with dividends reinvested would just skew results? your looking at how much the S&P increased in valued no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james22 Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 Ditch the Good, Buy the Bad and the Ugly ...GDP growth doesn’t matter for stock market investors. http://www.gmo.com/websitecontent/GMO_Quarterly_Letter_4Q14.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
handycap5 Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 i found the second page of this pdf very interesting. i believe if you extended into the 1800s, it would not change the results materially. if you exclude the highly unusual 2000 period, the lowest number is 8.1 CAGR for any starting year 1929 to the present (over 10 years). one can get wrapped around the axle on the question of "whether it is different this time" but I wouldn't bet on a material change in the past pattern. http://www.realclearmarkets.com/docs/2014/04/ac_2014_04-StockMarketCenterfold.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now