Jump to content

beerbaron

Member
  • Posts

    1,487
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by beerbaron

  1. Blockchain is nothing more than a distributed database it has huge potential but lots of hype is around that word now. As a rule of thumb if in a text you can replace blockchain with DB it's likely not a groundbreaking application. Also, blockchain is a lot less efficient than a db in terms of speed and size so you have to bear that in mind. Dont' get me wrong it will change part of the worlds "transactions" but as any new groundbreaking tech, lots of hype, just gotta separate the diamonds from the coal.

     

    BeerBaron

  2. :( Sight, I added BBD in my watch list 2 weeks ago and wanted to pick my friends brain that follows aeronotics tonight.

     

    I was kinda surprise the BBD stock did not meaningfully moved (added volatity but no real change) when the department of commerce imposed those fines... it seemed it was already priced in or people were expecting an agreement.

     

    BeerBaron

  3. The way you have to see it is not on the cost saving side. Most of the time those softwares allow for much more streamlined operations and it reduces the employee's workload. But what ends up happening is that the new IT platforms can generate so much reports that all of a sudden employees managing POs, supply, etc... end up reading reaports and acting on it. Sometimes the implementation completely fails and it's a big waste of money and efforts. Even worse, sometimes management refuses to revert back to avoid losing face or because it's just impossible.

     

    However, a proper IT platform also allows for a much more scallable business, usually companies that failed to properly invest into their IT start losing ground as they add more SKUs, place bigger orders, add suppliers, etc... A quick rule of thumb can be seen as every time you double the employee size you quadruple the information flow. Having a software to support all those complex tasks allows to add people to support the business without being affected by this exponential loss of efficiency (or less of).

     

    On a final note, IT investments should be seen as cost of doing business. You always have to invest in it, when it's not new software implementation it is support and upgrades. Most companies rely heavily one knowledge workers, hence knowledge has to be stored, process and acted upton.

     

    Regards

    BeerBaron

  4. So two questions have been troubling my mind over crypto currencies and I'm lik e non fanatic opinions on each of those.

     

    The ledger or full blockchain size.

    I don`t see how it would be feasible to have an exponentially growing ledger at the rate that would make bitcoin widely adopted. I can foresee the size growing at a rate much faster than any hd of SSD capacity. Las time I checked HDD were doubling every 3 years but I'm fairly certain that a a full transaction ledger would grow much faster than that. It has two problems against it, 1st as the growing user base grows it also grows the amount of transactions. So in a sense we might not be working on a much more aggresive power than HHD drive capacity. ID be happy to see anybody prove me wrong on this one but I do think there is one fundamental law, the size of the ledger cango to infinity, the size of a hard drive cannot.

     

    The power efficiency

    I really don't see how on a massive scale where every civilized human being would use a bit currency what kind of power would be necessary to maintain the hash at an acceptable rate. Already we are seeing stress in the video cards supply I don't see how a planet wide adoption would be even possible under a decentralized approach... did anybody did the calculations of how much eneergy would be needed to compute the blockchain in let's say 15 year from now? I would bet that those calculations would show a ridiculous amount of energy, and if the calculations would be applied to 50 years it would be a multiple of all of today's power plant.

     

    I did not dig very deep but my gut tells me that we are looking at a exponential power that is greater than our capacity to out innovate. Blockchain has a place in our future but probable not as widely adopted as we think. What do you guys think care to help me gather the data and see if the numbers makes sence in a long term approach?

     

    BeerBaron

  5. Hi, our company is considering switching law firms in a cost reduction effort. The majority of the work we need from a law firm is related with IP.

     

    I was wondering if anybody else on the board has experience switching law firms? Any recommendations?

    How did you proceed with negotiating a better rate? For example, were you able to negotiate better hourly rates?

     

    Thanks

    BeerBaron

  6. My take on this is I'll believe it when I see it. It's part of a large group of ideas that are technically feasible but also technically very difficult.

     

    I think Musk was smoking weed when he he stated the costs of such a system. No way it can be cheaper than other high speed alternatives.

     

    The kid in me says "WAY COOL", then engineer in me says "GOOD LUCK".

     

    BeerBaron

  7. Costco might be considered as generating float as the payment terms of distributors is 30 days after the goods are received in the stores. Goods are almost always sold in less than 30 days.

     

    Amazon, is also know for having negative working capital.

     

    Testing labs (ETL, UL) also have very good economics with 70% payment before the work is done and 30% once completed.

     

    Some would say that float is a wonderfull thing because it give free credit but I think it's the other way around. Free credit is only worth what the interest rate (1-2% these days for corporate bond yield). Nothing to go crazy about. Instead I believe that usually companies with float have a pricing power over their suppliers and customers that allows them to have favorable payment terms.

     

    Regards

    BeerBaron

  8. Yea that rate is false. But it's not unreasonable for USD/CNY to go to 8 if the Chinese stop supporting/propping up the currency. Of course they could stop doing that, especially if they're pissed off. But then who really knows what the Chinese will do?

     

    Thanks for the double checking. It goes to say that free data is not 100% right :)

     

    If I were the Chinese I would actually do something like that. Let the currency fall for an hour or two and bring it back to the initial level. Would be a  nice little warning shot for president elect.

     

    BeerBaron

  9. Couple of question here.

     

    Why would Brookfield earn outsize returns if infrastructure is privatized& Don't you think that when the government puts a project for bid that other player's like retirement funds, private asset managers, engineering firms, will not bid till the return are merely meeting the return on capital?

     

    Why would Brookfield get better returns on infrastructure than others?

     

    Do you think their current portfolio is worth multiples of what it is currently valued at? Why would it be a multiple of what it is today?

     

    BeerBaron

  10. Sometimes it amazes me how Trump can lack proper judgment for lack of better words. Of all the Hilary supporter he had to name the only one that 2 years ago was showing it's tax return on air to make a point...what were the odds of Buffett showing them again... like 100%!

     

    BeerBaron

  11. I'm not saying he's not a very bright businessman (he is!). I'm just saying he's not an innovator. He took existing things, made then white and shiny, added an i in front of the name and upped the price 40-100%. For some reason he knew people would swallow that crap in large numbers.

     

    I think there was a little more to it than that! But either way, serious question, who do you consider the most successful businessmen since you think innovation is such a key part of that title? I feel like every super successful businessman that I've ever looked into inevitably "copied" their idea from somewhere else.

     

     

    Very good point. I feel the others are successful businessmen as well as innovators, while he's only successful in business. I wasn't calling him a failure. Simply overrated (and he's rated very highly in general, so overrated is not as much as an insult as it may appear).

     

    I'm not sure how Musk is any more of an innovator than Jobs.  The electric car existed long before Musk came along...in fact electric cars have been around since the late 1800's!  SpaceX and Solar City aren't new ideas...he's just executing in a different way than others in the past. 

     

    Bezos did not invent online retailing...there were many online retailers before Amazon. 

     

    Even Bill Gates stole Windows from Jobs' NEXT operating system to forge Windows dominance in the PC OS market.

     

    I have a hard time understanding how someone who created arguably the most profitable company in the world today is not innovative when his products are ubiquitous and user-friendly.  Cheers!

     

    Agreed, I recommend reading the Job's Playboy interview from something like 1984. The guy had a vision of what was coming 20 years ahead of time. Just amazing...

     

    BeerBaron

  12. Extra weight also comes from an electric vehicle’s lithium-ion batteries, which include lesser amounts of cobalt and spherical graphite. (An all-electric Tesla Model S weighs 2,108 kg, compared to a gasoline-powered V6 Toyota Camry’s curb weight of 1,551 kg.)"

     

    Hmm, that kinda sucks. Assuming this is somewhat fair comparison, you have to lug around 1.4x weight. Doesn't that shoot the energy efficiency to smithereens? Yeah, I know price-wise fuel-only you still probably come out ahead in gas vs. electricity cost. But I'm talking about pure joule to joule comparison with losses included. Was this ever asked to Musk? (Sorry my physics is rusty, I'm sure resident experts will chime in)

     

    The extra weight is more than offset by the higher efficiency of the electric engine. Internal Combustion Engines have a maximum theoretical efficiency limit of around 30% while an electric motor can reach 80% and up. Furthermore, electric engines can recharge the batteries when braking. So even if your weight is heavier, you will get back most of this energy in a city driving environment.

     

    BeerBaron

     

×
×
  • Create New...