I don’t understand why Chris attracts so much criticism. He has always been generous with his time and comes across as a genuinely nice person. Some people may scoff at the composition of his portfolio, but outperforming the index by 1.5% is better than what most U.S. hedge funds achieve—and, I suspect, better than the results of many people on this board, despite inflated claims. Why should anyone care how he did it? Moreover, his analysis of Berkshire is, by far, the best I’ve encountered in my 30 years of investing. Much of the criticism seems to stem more from jealousy and envy than from any substantive shortcomings.