Jump to content

KJP

Member
  • Posts

    2,156
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by KJP

  1. What would the second chart below look like if you also marked to market the loan books of each of those banks? 

     

    4 minutes ago, changegonnacome said:

    You can see here just how far offside SVIB was relative to peers - whatever way you frame this.......its gross management incompetence bordering criminal negligence.

     

    https://am.jpmorgan.com/content/dam/jpm-am-aem/global/en/insights/eye-on-the-market/silicon-valley-bank-failure-amv.pdf

     

     

    Screenshot 2023-03-11 at 12.47.59 PM.png

    Screenshot 2023-03-11 at 12.49.01 PM.png

     

     

  2. Here's BSM's management's take:

     

    Monroe Helm

    Okay. One another maybe when you were setting your most recent distribution increase, did you take -- how seriously did you consider an environment where we might have $2 to $2.50 gas for some extended period of time?

     

    Tom Carter

    Well, I think we believe and took into account that '23 and '24 and maybe some into '25 that will be challenging for natural gas markets. Everyone I mean as we've all looked out over the last 5 years, I think it's a general consensus in the industry that until some of these newer LNG export facilities come online, there's going to be a lull in growth of natural gas because it's the production has gone up and the prices that were in existence last year really saw some increases in activity. We think it's going to be a period of time where we don't see that much growth but we're well hedged and we have agreements that we don't think our operators are going to be highly volatile in their well count.

  3. On 2/16/2023 at 10:18 AM, crs223 said:

    I just called and signed up for value line. The guy said he has not heard about discontinuing of the printed products.  maybe it was just a notice printed from my local library.

     

    You would probably like the formatting of this site:  https://roic.ai/classic/AAPL

     

    Perhaps someone more clever than me could explain how you could extract pages like that in bulk and print them out so you could page through them.

  4. 21 hours ago, Spekulatius said:

    The real problem with labor force participation is in the south:

    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/release/tables?rid=446&eid=784070

     

    Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, South Carolina, West Virginia, Mississippi .

    All MAGA land.

     

    The only Blue state coming close is Maine

    Some things don't change much.  That data series appears to go back almost 50 years to January 1976.  Here are the bottom 10 states in labor force participation then and now:

     

    Jan 1976 [For context, national was 61.3%]

    West Virginia - 51.7%

    Florida - 54.6%  [Dec. 2022:  59.6% -- surprising to me given the number of retirees]

    Louisiana - 55.7%

    Alabama - 55.9%

    Arkansas - 56.3%

    Mississippi - 57.5%

    New York - 57.6%  [60.1%]

    Pennsylvania - 57.6%  [61.6%]

    Tennessee - 58%

    Arizona - 58.5%  [61.4%]

     

     

    Dec 2022 [National was 62.3%]

    Mississippi - 54.1%

    West Virginia - 54.2%

    New Mexico - 55.8%  [Jan 1976:  59.3%]

    South Carolina - 55.9%  [64.3% -- huge decline.  Loss of textile manufacturing with insufficient new industry or increase in retirees?]

    Arkansas - 56.2%

    Alabama - 56.8%

    Kentucky - 57.2%  [59.5%]

    Maine - 57.5%  [60.6%]

    Tennessee - 58.5%

    Louisiana - 58.5%

     

     

    West Virginia, Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Tennessee make both lists, and New Mexico and Kentucky nearly did.  So whatever the underlying causes are for relatively low labor force participation in those states, they appear to go back a long time. 

     

     

     

     

  5. On 1/10/2023 at 3:07 PM, Spekulatius said:

    Sold IAC today - 15% loss. That Meredith purchase looks like a turd to me. Maybe I am giving up and selling too soon, wouldn't be the first time.

     

    They have admitted that switching all of the Meredith publications to their digital platform didn't go as smoothly as they hoped, and they're obviously getting hit on advertising revenue.  But even if you put a fairly low multiple on Dotdash-Meredith, IAC still looks quite cheap to me and if anyone is ever interested in this type of company, I think now is the time to buy it when it's selling for significantly less than the sum of its parts, rather than at a premium to them.  [Says the current bagholder.]

  6. 11 hours ago, Simba said:

    Stocks have been absolutely pummeled for 2022, so wouldn't be surprised to see the worst performers bounce back in 2023.

     

    This seems to be already happening.  For example, YTD on a few names familiar to CoBF:

     

    Charter +14%

    IAC +16%

    SNC Lavalin: +19%

     

    All beat up last year with an additional selloff near year end, now bouncing back.

  7. pre-tax, USD:

     

    2022:  -15%

     

    Significant losers:  Altice, Charter, American Outdoor Brands, IDT, IES Holdings, Leatt, SNC-Lavalin, Turning Point Brands, Comcast, IAC, LICT Corp.

    Based on that list, I'm surprised the results weren't even worse.  My winners were mostly buyouts/take privates:  Swedish Match, Hill International, Advant-e

    I still hold most of my 2022 losers -- we'll see how they perform in 2023.

     

    Historical

    2021: 11%

    2020: 14%

    2019: 31%

    2018: 11%

    2017: 10%

    2016: 22%

  8. 36 minutes ago, Longnose said:

     

    I bet we will see more INTL companies over the next few decades making shifts to transactions in BTC that is then converted back into thier fiat currencies for every day use. Its simpler, cheaper, and more secure. BTC could prove to be a global internet currency. 

     

     

    How is there going to be enough liquidity in BTC to do that?  What portion of BTC is effectively locked away with long-term holders?  Is the available "float" sufficient to support the very high transaction volumes that you envision?  If there's anything to Gresham's Law, it seems to weigh against the future you envision.

     

    I believe US deficits currently address this issue by providing dollars to the world that can then be used globally for transactions.  It would be interesting to see this system try to function if the transactional base was deflating (as may be the case in a future with Bitcoin as the transactional medium) versus inflating (as is the case today with USD when the US is in deficit).

     

     

  9. You can see historical numbers for Germany here:  https://de.usmortality.com/deaths/excess-yearly-cumulative and https://de.usmortality.com/deaths/weekly

     

    The chart at the first link shows deaths around normal until late 2020 (big deviation appears to begin in November), then fairly close to normal again until fall 2021 (deviation appears to begin in October) and at or above the top end of normal throughout 2022, with a significant move above normal beginning in September  and on pace to exceed 2021 (and any other recent year).   You can also see this in the shape of the line curves for 2020 - 2022 in the second link.

     

    You filter the data by age.  There are no excess deaths in the 0-29 group in 2022. 

  10. 3 minutes ago, Dinar said:

    Why did you sell?

     

    I sold very close to PM's offer price.  So, it seems to me that either PM gets enough to squeeze out at very close to the price I received or it doesn't, in which case I expect an opportunity to buy back in at a better price than today.  I'm doing this in a non-taxable account; if it was in a taxable account, I would have held.

     

    I must acknowledge that I have sometimes been wrong about the immediate share price movement in response to a failed takeover/squeeze out, so I can't contend that my reasoning is foolproof.

     

     

  11. 11 hours ago, Dinar said:

    I probably should add it to the list, but could it be too high end?  Gladwyne seems to be a bit snobby.

     

    That's probably fair, but you will find that in most of the areas you mentioned, e.g., Wayne.   In any event, LMSD, particularly the parts closer to the city like Merion and Penn Wynne, is quite overcrowded. 

     

    One area you might add to your list is Lower Gwynedd.  It's in Wissahickon SD, which isn't as lauded as Tredyffrin, Radnor, or LMSD but I know parents that have moved there from LMSD and prefer it.

     

    Newtown/Bucks County also has a much different feel than the Main Line.  Much more open space, orchards, etc.  And Doylestown and New Hope/Lambertville are nice options as far as those size towns go.  If you wanted a similar feel but west of the city, there are areas (i) between Newtown Square and West Chester, and (ii) northwest of Rt. 202 around Methacton and Worcester that have a similar feel.  They are probably a 1.25 hour (at least) commute into the city if that matters.

  12. 33 minutes ago, Dinar said:

    suburbs of Phily (Radnor Township School District, Tredy- school district, Newton Bucks County, Richboro),

    The folks in Lower Merion SD are aghast they didn't make the list.

  13. 3 hours ago, crs223 said:


    Thank you.

     

    I normally recommend people understand why a particular bond is paying an unusually high rate.  In The case of iBonds I assumed that it was just a free giveaway.  Apparently I’m overthinking it.

     

    Carvana bonds are also offered at high rates. Okay to “overthink” that one - probably not a free giveaway!

     

    It's been said here, but the price of this particular bond is not set by buying and selling in a liquid marketplace.  In theory, if the price is off of what it otherwise would be, you could engage in some type of arbitrage with a publicly traded security and continue to do it until the system broke (or the government sold nothing but I-bonds) or re-sell the security at a higher price.  But the quantity restrictions by buyer type and amount prevent and that, and non-transferability prevents black markets from arising to adjust the price.  That's what creates the possibility of having a security that, to use efficient markets jargon, is perpetually and openly beyond the risk/reward frontier.  (Also an example of why price caps typically require forced rationing or create shortages.)  

  14. 3 hours ago, Paarslaars said:

    Yeah I work in the industry, the biggest concern is nickel for the high nickel NMC versions (NMC622, NMC811,...)

     

    Are there potentially viable alternative chemistries that use substantially less nickel?  Or do nearly all reasonable scenarios require substantially more nickel (and I assume cobalt) production?

  15. 12 hours ago, Spekulatius said:

    The e- yuan is very iffy from a privacy POV, because the Chinese central bank basically knows exactly where the digital money is and what it’s doing, if this works as advertised. So it should absolutely get forbidden in every country that cares about privacy and their citizen being watched by the Chinese central bank.

    Privacy is the main issue with CBDC - yes it can be done, but should it be done? It might just be better of improving the payment infrastructure and make the ACH payment almost instantaneous rather than taking 3+ days to clear. That alone would go a long way to digitize the payment system without wrecking the privacy.

    My understanding is that is what FedNow is intended to become:  https://www.frbservices.org/financial-services/fednow/about.html

     

    Note that FedNow's architecture appears to entrench current US financial institutions rather than displace them. 

     

  16. 7 minutes ago, wabuffo said:

    On the other hand you have some pretty massive twin deficits...

     

    1) Federal budget deficit is shrinking fast and is currently in surplus mode.  A shrinking deficit that is too small is deflationary is actually causing the USD to strengthen against gold, commodities & other currencies.

     

    spacer.png

     

    2) The trade deficit is how the rest of the world acquires dollars (they net export to the US in order to get them).   Trade deficit is exploding which is another indication that there may be a shortage of dollars right now.

     

    FWIW,

    Bill

     

     

    Will those surpluses continue, or will Treasury return to deficits now that peak tax season is over?

  17. Swedish Match accepts PM buyout offer at 106 SEK/share:  https://www.wsj.com/articles/swedish-match-agrees-to-16-billion-takeover-by-philip-morris-11652252817

     

    Is there a strategic buyer who could come in with a topping bid?

     

    BAT:  No.  I believe a transaction would impossible for BAT, because SWMA and BAT are an oral nicotine duopoly in Scandinavia. 

    Altria:  Given on! and Zyn's positions in the US nicotine pouch market, would this make sense and could it get by US antitrust regulators?

    Japan Tobacco:  Don't know enough about them

    Imperial Brands:  Don't know enough about them, but a quick look at the balance sheet suggests they likely the capacity to do it.

     

    As for non-strategics, is a heavily regulated  industry like tobacco an area they want to get into?  The businesses have great cash flow characteristics, so they can handle debt.  And there are many who argue that nicotine pouches, in particular, ought to score very highly on ESG measures because they believed to be much, much healthier than cigarettes, so switching people over to them could save/improve many lives.

×
×
  • Create New...