Parsad Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 Glad she said it. About time investors realized exactly what they are investing in and the risks involved...regardless of how minute they may be. Cheers! http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-05-11/fdic-s-bair-says-u-s-money-funds-destabilizing-to-markets-at-sec-forum.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
claphands22 Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 from the article... the three biggest money-fund providers, defended the business as popular among investors and crucial to the financing of U.S. companies and municipalities. This argument doesn't sound reasonable to me. If investors choose not to put their cash in money market funds they will put their cash in other deposit taking institutions that will inevitably have to invest the cash in interest bearing assets such as financing US companies and municipalities. Granted less money might flow into these areas due to restrictions in traditional deposit taking institutions, but the system will become more robust which is more important than decreasing commercial interest rates by a couple of basis points. (I have no idea how much it will increase commercial funding, but I'd like to know) Floating money market funds sounds like a good idea...I wonder what would be another way to regulate the money market funds so they don't cause a liquidity crisis in a panic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now