bookie71 Posted April 2, 2009 Share Posted April 2, 2009 http://www.wescofinancial.com/cm2008.pdf enjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basl1 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Business and human quality in place atWesco continues to be not nearly as good, all factors considered, as that in place at Berkshire Hathaway.Wesco is not an equally-goodbut- smaller version of Berkshire Hathaway, better because its small size makes growth easier. Instead, each dollar of book value atWesco continues plainly to provide much less intrinsic value than a similar dollar of book value at Berkshire Hathaway. Moreover, the quality disparity in book value’s intrinsic merits has, in recent years, continued to widen in favor of Berkshire Hathaway. interesting statement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UhuruPeak Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Yeah, I took it as a subtle hint that BRK was doing better than the market expects - or in other words, Munger thinks BRK is undervalued. I may be reading too much though, still substantially long Berkshire (though not as much as before as I've largely swapped for FFH) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodstove Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Doesn't he write that every year? Is the wording meaningfully changed? Seems like parsing fed-speak. His comments about Precision Steel were curious. I gather he thinks the business is declining in terms of customer potential long term, but I'm not clear why that should be. Seems to me an economic recovery should create steel demand and Precision should again get it's share of that business. I realize Precision is a drop in the bucket for Wesco - the steel service centre industry itself interests me and just trying to figure out Charlie's outlook. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basl1 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 It's curious to me why he's in precision steel at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basl1 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 and why does Charlie persist with WSC if brk is so much better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zarley Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Doesn't he write that every year? Yeah, he's included something like that in every letter I've read. I don't take it for much beyond face value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UhuruPeak Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Doesn't he write that every year? Yeah, he's included something like that in every letter I've read. I don't take it for much beyond face value. Ok, my bad. Thx for the correction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zarley Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Ok, my bad. Thx for the correction No worries. I took a look at the 1997 letter (the earliest letter linked from the BRK website) and that same language is in there near the end. Makes me wonder when he started putting that in there and what motivated him to add that reminder/warning. http://www.wescofinancial.com/cm1997.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now