John Hjorth Posted January 9, 2019 Author Share Posted January 9, 2019 Dynamic, lol. Well, the chess watch on that has perhaps not only run out - Perhaps the metal parts of it are now already recycled into a SUV right front fender. On a serious note, I'm happy I in this topic opted for voters to edit. Errare humanum est. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foreign Tuffett Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 +7.24% Things I did well: - Used volatility to my advantage. In other words, I did a fairly good job of buying low and selling high. The vast majority of companies/stocks aren't long term compounders, so I think being sensitive to valuation is very important - Used special situations (tender offers, merger arb, etc) and ex-US investments to diversify - My larger positions did materially better than my smaller positions - I ran a diversified portfolio all year, which increases the odds that I actually did some things right, and wasn't just lucky - While there were some unfortunate exceptions, I generally maintained price discipline when buying and selling instead of "chasing the tape" up and down - To paraphrase Lord Keynes: when the facts changed, I did a fairly good job of changing my mind. Things I need to improve: - At times I bought before doing sufficient due diligence. This isn't mere hindsight, I knew at the time that my research was insufficient, but bought anyway out of fear of missing out and/or impatience - I invested in low quality (tangible asset heavy, cyclical, industry in secular decline, etc) businesses without demanding a sufficient margin of safety. This year I plan to focus on higher quality businesses - I need to swing the bat a little harder when I see a fat pitch. I'm naturally risk adverse, so this is difficult for me to do - I generally find nano/micro/small cap companies much easier to understand and analyze than large and mega cap companies. This year I plan on doing a better job of "staying in my lane" - While my sample size is small, buy decisions based primarily or exclusively on quantitative criteria haven't worked very well for me. I need to focus on qualitative criteria too. - Focus on the underlying business and ignore the noise. Focus on the underlying business and ignore the noise. Focus on the underlying business and ignore the noise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now