clutch Posted December 6, 2020 Share Posted December 6, 2020 I had a Deja Vu of reading this thread and hence came here to report the last 5 year returns of FANG vs. BRK... just for fun. FANG: 28.57% annualized BRK: 11.26% annualized p.s. S&P500: 13.99% annualized Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpha Posted December 8, 2020 Share Posted December 8, 2020 I had a Deja Vu of reading this thread and hence came here to report the last 5 year returns of FANG vs. BRK... just for fun. FANG: 28.57% annualized BRK: 11.26% annualized p.s. S&P500: 13.99% annualized I think the real surprise is that rates have been so low for so long, that is really the driving factor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scorpioncapital Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 Is it? How can we separate low rates by growth rate? Would tech growth rate be reduced by higher rates enough to make a difference, since higher rates also reduce value stock business prospects? The only explanation I can think of why Berkshire would outperform in higher rate environment is just cash which will be more valuable and some businesses like financials or utilities that may make more money in a counter-cyclical kind of way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now