Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know that Berkshire is pretty large now so outperforming the S&P might be tough, but not quite this tough.  If you look  at a 5 year graph, Berkshire has under-performed by a cumulative 20% over that time frame.  I'm not sure if this means something or nothing, but it was interesting to me. 

Posted

I think it mainly reflects the fact that Berkshire didn't decline as much in the financial crisis.  So 5 years captures only the recovery from the crisis price levels on the index.  If you select 4 years Berkshire outperforms.  3 years Berkshire outperforms, 10 years Berkshire outperforms, etc...

Posted

How did you arrive at 11%?  I get something like 8% plus a half year of the SPX dividend yield

 

YTD Berkshire has underperformed the S&P 500 index by 11%.

Posted
How did you arrive at 11%?

 

It was 11% a couple of days back. As of 6/25/15, total return of S&P 500 index was 3.12% whereas Berkshire was down 7.26% which means that the index outperformed Berkshire by 10.38%.

Posted

Anyone have any rough calculations of Berkshire's book value?

 

It depends on how the Heinz write-up is handled.  Last report had Book at about $98 per B share.  Current book could be anywhere from 98 to 105 per B share, but the HNZ deal won't close in the 2nd quarter, so the jump could come in Q3.

Posted

Both BRK and FFH outperformed SP500 a lot last year, so there is some "reason" for the underperformance this year.

 

OTOH, it might be opportunity to add.

Posted

I've been adding as it dips below 140.  Would love it if BRK stayed low as lots of cash comes in from arbs in the next week or so.  BH, DTV, a lot of deals about to close.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...