ragnarisapirate Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Curious if anyone has looked into plays on the capacity of natural gas- ie pipeline owners or companies that manufacture parts or service them. NOT natural gas producers or consumers. It seems that with the coming glut of plants, that would be an interesting play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bz1516 Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Along those lines I'd rather participate with fraccing plays, particularly the frac sand plays, my favorite being EMES. Fraccing companies may be a way to participate as well. i like TCW and CFW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItsAValueTrap Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 With the pipeline companies it's a little complex. Many (though not all) of the underlying pipelines basically arbitrage the different prices between two locations. The shale boom is causing dislocations in the natural gas market. A lot of infrastructure was setup to receive gas from the Gulf of Mexico... but lower gas prices and deepwater horizon-related costs are reasons for lower GoM production. A lot of infrastructure was setup to import natural gas into the US via LNG shipments. That pipeline volume is presumably down a lot. Everybody is converting their LNG import terminals into export terminals. It's a crazy reversal. On the other hand, there is opportunity for pipeline companies. Shale assets produce "rich" natural gas as opposed to dry natural gas. Weirdly enough, rich natural gas burns too hot for most customers because it contains too much ethane. The gas has to be sent to cyrogenic plants to remove the ethane (which turns into a liquid, which can be trucked away or sent somewhere else via pipeline). Refrigeration plants also remove ethane but they don't remove enough; some 10-Ks for shale companies say that they are writing down their investments in refrigeration plants. So... the US will need to built the pipelines and the cyrogenic plants and more pipelines to move ethane and natural gas liquids to other markets. Because most shale companies are moving to natural gas liquids plays, they will produce a lot of rich natural gas and a lot of NGLs. In the Utica shale, they can't drill more wells (or have to lower production on new wells) until new infrastructure comes online. There is way too much rich gas. There's the CoBaF thread on KMI warrants: http://www.cornerofberkshireandfairfax.ca/forum/investment-ideas/kmi-5yr-warrants/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CorpRaider Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Yeah, I own KMI and am watching SYNL, which owned by Markel and Royce. They manufacture pipes used in the pipelines and tanks used in storage. Hasn't gotten cheap enough for me to pull the trigger yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogermunibond Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 NVGS is a large mid size LPG carrier company that Wilbur Ross took out of the old Lehman. They are on a major fleet expansion. The idea is that petrochem liquids production is going to spike from NGLs in the wet gas plays as well as from increased refinery export of LPGs that are derived from the refining process. It's not cheap though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ni-co Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 How about Ackman's APD (Air Products & Chemicals)? They supply gas liquefaction equipment. It's not a pure play, but I think it is the main reason behind Ackman's bet, aside from the momentarily bad capital allocation that he tries to fix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bz1516 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 I like frac sand as a way to capture the greatest leverage to growth in both oil and gas. Because the latest technology utilizes much more sand per well it is the fastest growing part of the oil and gas industry. Of the three frac sand plays I like EMES the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gjangal Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 CBI (Chicago bridge and Iron) As many of you probably know it's a Buffett/Weschler/Combs pick Some points from 10-K and IR presentation: Their major source of revenue is winning major construction projects in 1. Hydrocarbon refining, petrochemicals and natural gas industry. Building LNG terminals , Engineering procurement and construction activity 2. Technology patents related to refining hydrocarbons 3. Nuclear power services related revenue Cautionary note: This is my newbie thesis for the stock Order book is at the end of DEC 13 is $ 25B and has been growing. TTM Revenue at 9.6B. Gross margins around 12-13%. They predict the capex on construction projects related to energy sector go on till 2020 [iR presentation]. Pretty much every marquee oil company is their client Its priced at 14 times next year earnings, but if the cycle persists and they continue winning energy related projects, EPS could grow double digits. Some Risks: 1. Industry is very competitive for winning projects, pricing and margins pressure 2. Capital intensive depending on the type of project executed ( fixed or cost plus) 3. Projects on the backlog can be cancelled Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix01 Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Exposure to a single commodity and customers that are concentrated in one sector. High debt & capital requirements. In light of a possible economic downturn, I have been buying puts against some of the most vulnerable players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now