Jump to content

bookie71

Member
  • Posts

    1,009
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bookie71

  1. You might look at CET (Central Securities) it trades at a discount to NAV and it's big asset is discounted at about 20%, so you get a double discount. I've looking at it for my kids, but still on the edge- I',m not sure if Fairholme is getting too big, I have some in their accounts from some time back, but the fund seems to be making some very risky plays (to me)

  2. I don't know what happens now, but in the mid 1980's when so many banks failed in Alaska, you became an unsecured creditor and had to wait until the bank is liquidated as in any other bankruptcy.

    If someone has the knowledge and time to investigate there is a lot of money to be made in buying the loan packages from FDIC but you can loose your shirt if you don't do your own due diligence.

  3. The only problem with checklists is that you have to be very careful that you use them and don't think things out.  In the accounting profession you need a checklist to make sure you haven't missed a checklist. It's amazing what gets missed simply because some of the new folks don;t step back and simply read through the statements they are drafting.

    I am not against checklists, but do believe they can be overdone.

    jmho

  4. Insert Quote

    The selling by Gates foundation is 3~5% of daily volume for the past several months, I think the consistent selling has had a negative effect on the share price, not sure how much though.

     

    Why would they sell so much? It's not that foundation needs the cash now, and Gates has said something like he sees BRK share price go much

    higher.

    .

    .

    I think they are required to distribute a certain % (5%?) of assets each year, by law, as they are a private foundation.  I think WEB requires they spend a certain amount each year also.  Since BRK has no dividend this requires sales. 

×
×
  • Create New...