Jump to content

Wanderer

Member
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Wanderer

  1. https://ir.andrewpeller.com/news/news-details/2026/Andrew-Peller-Enters-into-Definitive-Agreement-to-be-Acquired-by-Fairfax/default.aspx
  2. Let's come back to the fundamentals: I think, Greg just looked a GOOG's backlog, checked in with the companies owned by BRK, checked in with BHE and came to the conclusion that GOOG's cash inflow is likely to increase significantly in the next years. (I know, a P/E of 30 is high - or 40, if you substract the capital gains from Anthropic and SpaceX, but couldn't it be that GOOG will grow into this valuation?)
  3. The general question that's worth to be discussed on this forum is, how do deal with a "tension" between the intrinsic value and the stock price. To take an example we all know, Fairfax India is worth much more than it is traded for. If you just look on the financials, you should "go all in", build a huge position. But, as everybody is aware of, the big question is, WHEN will this intrinsic value be reflected in a market price you'll want take to cash out of the investment? I personally am very hesitant to put a lot of money into something like Fairfax India, because I know, they'll be cash restrained for a long time. They don't take the low stock price as an invitation to buy more, because they'd have to cash out of investments they also consider to be undervalued. Fairfax, the mother company, is a different animal though. They produce cash continously and are known for being opportunistic. They use all kinds of means to increase the value per share, including buybacks. Just look at what they did in the last years. That's why I'm very confident, that the "drop for no reason" will either be irrelevant or beneficial in the long run. It you feel uncomfortable about the stock price falling off from an all time high, you should reconsider your weighting or how often you discuss your performance with your husband or wife. I personally never talk about the size of our portfolio with anyone, including my wife, so I don't have any pressure to "perform".
  4. dartmonkey's point is that earnings of consolidated holdings are already in the reported earnings of FFH. So earnings reflect the consolidated businesses in full, but book value understates their market worth. Vice versa, what's in the book at fair value is expressed (more) accurate in the book value, but not in FFHs reported earnings (which understate the earnings of holdings at fair value).
  5. On page 34 of his 2025 letter to shareholders Prem writes Does anyone know how Prem conceptionalizes rebalancing? I don't understand why he would sell a position that's relatively small and still trading at an attractive valuation.
×
×
  • Create New...