Jump to content

Dimon Would Be Best to Lead Treasury in Crisis, Buffett Says


Recommended Posts

Posted

Dimon is too political to be in Treasury IMO.  And I certainly don't want a pure banker to be in Treasury during a crisis.  Remember Paulson's one-page "I can do whatever I want with all the money and a court can't supervise me" plan?

Posted

JD would not come off well to people in the government. I remember when i first started listening to JPM conference calls and I thought immediately "JD comes across as a real ahole". he isn't, he is just very passionate but most people won't stand around to discover the truth.

 

If JD left JPM, i would seriously consider selling my shares.

Posted

Dimon has said repeatedly that he is not interested in the Treasury Secretary job, so I don't think there is much chance of this happening. As a JPM shareholder, I too hope that he stays on as CEO for a long time. I probably will keep my shares even if he leaves though.

Posted

JPM has benefited tremendously from the financial crisis....not only has their domestic share gone up but so has their investment banking/trading share ...i really should have loaded up at tangible book but I'm adding slowly from levels here.....WFS is good too but its trading at a 30% premium....

Posted

JPM has benefited tremendously from the financial crisis....not only has their domestic share gone up but so has their investment banking/trading share ...i really should have loaded up at tangible book but I'm adding slowly from levels here.....WFS is good too but its trading at a 30% premium....

 

Well, the stock is still selling at less than 10% over tangible book. Also, take a look at the JPM treasury warrants. I own slightly more in warrants than in stock (dollar amounts). The warrants expire in October 2018, have a strike price of $42.42 and are currently trading at $10.94. If you believe that the stock is trading well below intrinsic value, then the warrants are a better deal than the stock, I think.

 

I own WFC too, but it has been expensive compared to the other big banks for a while now.

Posted

JPM has benefited tremendously from the financial crisis....not only has their domestic share gone up but so has their investment banking/trading share ...i really should have loaded up at tangible book but I'm adding slowly from levels here.....WFS is good too but its trading at a 30% premium....

 

Well, the stock is still selling at less than 10% over tangible book. Also, take a look at the JPM treasury warrants. I own slightly more in warrants than in stock (dollar amounts). The warrants expire in October 2018, have a strike price of $42.42 and are currently trading at $10.94. If you believe that the stock is trading well below intrinsic value, then the warrants are a better deal than the stock, I think.

 

I own WFC too, but it has been expensive compared to the other big banks for a while now.

 

I don't know why I don't have any warrants on any banks.  I think almost every bank is cheap

 

Do the JPM ones have dividend/share repurchase clauses? 

Posted

I don't know why I don't have any warrants on any banks.  I think almost every bank is cheap

 

Do the JPM ones have dividend/share repurchase clauses?

 

The JPM warrants have similar provisions as the treasury warrants for BAC, WFC etc. There is some protection against share issuance, but I don't remember the details. The strike price gets adjusted for dividends in excess of $1.52 per year.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...