Jump to content

Interesting question: Should Value Investors Change their Style?


indythinker85

Recommended Posts

http://www.valuewalk.com/2012/10/should-value-investors-change-their-style-tom-russo-vs-mohnish-pabrai/ I would add that although Pabrai had awful 08, Russo had a bad 08 as well.

 

Something doesn't jive with me on the article...

 

This line in particular when the author is contrasting their styles:

 

"Diversification in the portfolio is a key to Pabrai’s strategy."

 

If anything Pabrai has a concentrated strategy and Russo has much more diversification and holds many more positions.

 

The author has a much different definition of diversification than I do.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.valuewalk.com/2012/10/should-value-investors-change-their-style-tom-russo-vs-mohnish-pabrai/ I would add that although Pabrai had awful 08, Russo had a bad 08 as well.

 

Something doesn't jive with me on the article...

 

This line in particular when the author is contrasting their styles:

 

"Diversification in the portfolio is a key to Pabrai’s strategy."

 

If anything Pabrai has a concentrated strategy and Russo has much more diversification and holds many more positions.

 

The author has a much different definition of diversification than I do.

 

Not quite, after the  08 crisis, Pabrai publicly commented that concentrated holdings was a mistake and he'd run a diversified strategy in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.valuewalk.com/2012/10/should-value-investors-change-their-style-tom-russo-vs-mohnish-pabrai/ I would add that although Pabrai had awful 08, Russo had a bad 08 as well.

 

Something doesn't jive with me on the article...

 

This line in particular when the author is contrasting their styles:

 

"Diversification in the portfolio is a key to Pabrai’s strategy."

 

If anything Pabrai has a concentrated strategy and Russo has much more diversification and holds many more positions.

 

The author has a much different definition of diversification than I do.

 

Not quite, after the  08 crisis, Pabrai publicly commented that concentrated holdings was a mistake and he'd run a diversified strategy in the future.

 

Yea, but it was still more concentrated than most I believe with a 2% 5% 10% sizing which would result in less holdings than Russo imo.  Also, he's since gone back to the 10x10 concentrated size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest rimm_never_sleeps

http://www.valuewalk.com/2012/10/should-value-investors-change-their-style-tom-russo-vs-mohnish-pabrai/ I would add that although Pabrai had awful 08, Russo had a bad 08 as well.

 

Something doesn't jive with me on the article...

 

This line in particular when the author is contrasting their styles:

 

"Diversification in the portfolio is a key to Pabrai’s strategy."

 

If anything Pabrai has a concentrated strategy and Russo has much more diversification and holds many more positions.

 

The author has a much different definition of diversification than I do.

 

Not quite, after the  08 crisis, Pabrai publicly commented that concentrated holdings was a mistake and he'd run a diversified strategy in the future.

 

diversification for pabrai is holding 15 stocks instead of 8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

God this article was awful.  It had it all.  No direction, incorrect facts, inconsistencies, etc.  Here is a great line.  "He [Pabrai] agrees with Charlie Munger that a diversified portfolio can be achieved with just four different stocks, but he thinks that is nowhere near enough."  I get it.  According to the author, he agrees with it even though he thinks its not even close.  I always like someone who can act at the same time on both sides of an issue.  Shows flexibility I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

God this article was awful.  It had it all.  No direction, incorrect facts, inconsistencies, etc.  Here is a great line.  "He [Pabrai] agrees with Charlie Munger that a diversified portfolio can be achieved with just four different stocks, but he thinks that is nowhere near enough."  I get it.  According to the author, he agrees with it even though he thinks its not even close.  I always like someone who can act at the same time on both sides of an issue.  Shows flexibility I guess.

 

Found that sentence hilarious as well. Almost thought it was due to my poor English skills. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...