finetrader Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 https://www.indiatoday.in/business/story/thomas-cook-collapses-thomas-cook-india-name-change-1602509-2019-09-24
longlake95 Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 It's a shame that several top execs took something like 20M pounds in comp over the last 5 years, while Thomas Cook was floundering. It's been in bad shape for several years. Another sad case of weak corporate governance - shareholders, the people who own the business, should have more say on pay. I have no problem with managements making big $$$, if the business does well - sounds crazy I know. LOL https://globalnews.ca/news/5944313/thomas-cook-bosses-salaries/
StubbleJumper Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 It's a shame that several top execs took something like 20M pounds in comp over the last 5 years, while Thomas Cook was floundering. It's been in bad shape for several years. Another sad case of weak corporate governance - shareholders, the people who own the business, should have more say on pay. I have no problem with managements making big $$$, if the business does well - sounds crazy I know. LOL https://globalnews.ca/news/5944313/thomas-cook-bosses-salaries/ The compensation was 20 million pounds divided by 5 years and probably divided by perhaps 5 senior executives? Somebody will have to explain to me why 20/5/5 is an outrageous annual pay packet for a senior executive. Or, as was the public expectation with Sears Canada, perhaps people expect senior executives to work for free when their company is floundering? SJ
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now