Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's a shame that several top execs took something like 20M pounds in comp over the last 5 years, while Thomas Cook was floundering. It's been in bad shape for several years. Another sad case of weak corporate governance - shareholders, the people who own the business, should have more say on pay.

 

I have no problem with managements making big $$$, if the business does well - sounds crazy I know. LOL

 

 

https://globalnews.ca/news/5944313/thomas-cook-bosses-salaries/

Posted

It's a shame that several top execs took something like 20M pounds in comp over the last 5 years, while Thomas Cook was floundering. It's been in bad shape for several years. Another sad case of weak corporate governance - shareholders, the people who own the business, should have more say on pay.

 

I have no problem with managements making big $$$, if the business does well - sounds crazy I know. LOL

 

 

https://globalnews.ca/news/5944313/thomas-cook-bosses-salaries/

 

 

The compensation was 20 million pounds divided by 5 years and probably divided by perhaps 5 senior executives?  Somebody will have to explain to me why 20/5/5 is an outrageous annual pay packet for a senior executive.  Or, as was the public expectation with Sears Canada, perhaps people expect senior executives to work for free when their company is floundering?

 

 

SJ

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...