Jump to content

Desert_Rat

Member
  • Posts

    305
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Desert_Rat

  1. Hey all:

     

    The results of the latest California bar exam are out...The results are getting even worse!  Hard to believe but it is true! 

     

    What has happened all across the land is that more & more people are hearing what a rip-off law schools have become and the sorry state of the legal profession.  SO law schools are getting fewer qualified applicants...like a LOT fewer applicants.  I think it is down about 40%

     

    So what is a law professor and law skool Dean to do?  Their salaries don't pay themselves! 

     

    Why not just let in more students that would have been rejected in the past due to poor LSAT scores and low grades?  Got to keep the seats full!  Just think, you can get 3-4 years of money from that student.

     

    A perfect scheme, EXCEPT eventually those students have to take the bar exam.  Results have been falling for YEARS now, as the schools need to stay full (or as close to it as they can) to make the money.

     

    Well, there is now a big problem in California (and other states), as MANY skools now have less than 50% passage rate.  Heck, some skools have LESS THAN A 25% passage rate.  Here are the latest results:

     

    Santa Clara: 69 percent

    Loyola (LA): 67 percent

    Western State: 67 percent

    UCLA: 64 percent

    Pepperdine: 59 percent

    U. San Diego: 53 percent

    McGeorge: 50 percent

    STATEWIDE AVERAGE: 45 PERCENT

    California Western: 45 percent

    Golden Gate: 33 percent

    U. San Francisco: 31 percent

    UC Hastings: 27 percent

    Southwestern: 24 percent

    Thomas Jefferson: 24 percent

     

    I know a graduate (who passed the bar) of "Southwestern"...they did not have a very outcome in their life...Tuition at Southwestern is now $51k a year.  Not even 25% of their graduates are passing the bar.

     

    When is the ABA going to step in and say "enough is enough"?  What the heck is the department of Education doing?  What level of loans from these students are going to get repaid?  If you can't pass the bar, how the heck do become an attorney?  If you can't become an attorney, what is the point of your education?  To enrich the professors, deans and school? 

     

    Enough is enough, these "skools" need to be shutdown.

     

    I laughed.

     

    From what I read 75% of California black youth can't read at state level either, and that level, compared to the rest of America, must be ridiculously low.

     

    Honestly, I don't hire lawyers but i do try hiring the kids of today. They're all unprepared to accomplish anything in life. Mostly idiots, mechanically illiterate, uncomfortable with basic tools. I bet they're good gamers and have substantial followers though! I say good luck, future generations - plural because I can't see why and how it will ever get better.

     

  2. This latest and greatest proposed solution sure is getting a lot of play here. I never even heard of Moelis before thursday, but has anyone determined what shareholders they're actually advising?

     

    I'll be first: They're not advising me.

     

    John Paulson and Blackstone, apparently. See below.

     

    https://www.axios.com/first-look-john-paulsons-blueprint-for-reforming-fannie-freddie-2428957928.html

     

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-01/paulson-blackstone-said-to-back-plan-for-freeing-fannie-freddie

     

    Definitive. Thanks.

    The paper, "Restoring Safety and Soundness to the GSEs," is available here. It was written by Moelis & Company, as financial adviser to some Fannie and Freddie stockholders, including Paulson & Co. and Blackstone GSO Capital Partners.

  3. Thoughts on these filing's?

     

    http://www.glenbradford.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Document.pdf

     

    http://www.glenbradford.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Document-1.pdf

     

    Particularly:

     

    "In sum, because a purchase of stock, whether in an original issuance or on the secondary market, forms a new contract with the corporation rather than assignment of a past contract, the objections advanced in Class Plaintiffs’ Petition are without merit and do not warrant rehearing."

     

    "In such a case, the owner presumably paid a discounted price for the property. Compensating him for a ‘taking’ would confer a windfall.”

     

    They're pretty funny. They should have known they'd be ripped off is quite a defense!

  4. Do you think market does not think much of the proposal? With $25 for pfd and $13 for common by 2020, at least they could have risen to 40% of value. That is like 4-5x gain over 4 years from today's prices, investors should be lining up.

     

    The most liquid issue i own:

     

    Watt declares withholding dividend in front of members of Congress: Up 7% on 2x volume

    Another thinktank offers their opinion, and it's kinda favorable:  Up 1% on 3x lower volume

     

    No one cares

  5. @cherzeca

     

    To play devils advocate, do you foresee any risk that MBA proposals and Corker/Warner get what they want and hand over the business to TBTF banks?  Or you are saying it's a systemic impossibility due to the $100bn capital hole as you describe it.  And if it is a systemic impossibility, have you put your entire net worth into the preferred shares?  Seems like a home run to me. 

     

    If I might be so bold...

     

    NO

    NEVER

    NOT IN A MILLION YEARS

    IT'S SILLY TO EVEN ASK

     

  6. "Currently there is virtually no capital in the conventional secondary mortgage market (Treasury has taken it out), so our first priority must be to ensure we can attract sufficient capital for the $5 trillion in credit guarantees that already exist."  https://howardonmortgagefinance.com/2017/04/25/narrowing-the-differences/comment-page-1/#comment-3527

     

    just think about it.  forget about new mortgages and new guarantees on their MBS.  there are $5T of guarantees in place without any capital support.  corker says there is >$200B of capital in place in the form of treasury support, but everyone views this as either nonconstructive or absurd.  no one in treasury and few in congress want to see another draw on this line; indeed, one of trump's first executive orders was to empower treasury to end bailouts, and this can only mean that the administration wants to replace the line, not use the line

     

    so any proposal that calls for new monoline insurers, and a new guarantee backstop for housing finance going forward, does not address the current capital hole; let's call it $100B of capital.

     

    all proposals call for private capital to fill this $100B hole, but CRT transactions dont provide capital, they just shift credit risk, and in fact watt was recently candid enough to admit that fhfa is uncertain how much credit risk is actually transferred...this is a function of how fast prepayments pay down the credit support tranches bought by investors.

     

    the only way that $100B hole can be filled is to associate it with the guarantee fee income that the GSEs receive for incurring the $5T in liabilities...and that means eliminating the senior preferred, which conveniently enough, is about to be repaid in full on the basis of the original deal.

     

    these are stark financial facts, imo.

     

    I know you don't talk much but would you care to support that a bit? In order for a $100b hole to be covered it would take a decade if tax reform goes through, or still a long time even if it doesn't. How is that a solution to building a capital buffer fast enough to ward off the next recession, which may already be overdue?

     

  7. Crapo: hey, let's throw a carrot that we want to finally get this done after 8 years.

    Corker: they will figure it out, it's a lie, we have done it enough times

    Crapo: nah. we will debate it for many months, then go one recess, then to budget, then to tax reform and soon it will be 2020.

    Corker: you are a genius.

    Crapo: yes I am.

    Corker: Let's get back to shorting it.

     

    https://www.politicopro.com/financial-services/story/2017/05/senators-look-to-reach-housing-finance-deal-this-year-157422

     

    I don't doubt that the principles involved with FnF/housing reform want a solution, and fast, but when one side of the aisle is demanding govt involvement as an entitlement for the poor, and the other is demanding the govt exit completely, with a whole bunch of others are fearful of what any change to a successful 70 year program will bring, and another demanding no govt backstop, you get stalemate.

     

    Eternal stalemate.

     

  8. $4.1 trillion budget, and I'm not secure because radicals are allowed to immigrate, the streets I drive are a mess, cost for healthcare is ridiculous, 40 years of investment will likely mean squat on SS, I have no interest in medicare and all its pitfalls, most inter-space innovation is not from NASA, apparently everything i do and say is recorded by social media, aka NSA, and I guess I should learn words like 'ze'.

     

    All I want from my phucking govt is defense and infrastructure. THAT'S IT.

     

  9. SPY Sept options. I've had $200 puts.

     

    Game ends right prior to Comey 7/24 hearing, after which market will soar.

     

    Complete opposite. Not only didn't the market care about all that fakenews, I mean, at all, but it looks like the hearing isn't happening either. As far as fakenews goes, this one was insanely fake.

     

    Regardless, still accumulating SPY puts. Next time I'll temporarily close out EOD on this type news and reestablish after.

  10. "Trump budget estimates $fnma and $fmcc will give $142bn for "deficit reduction" over next 10 years under NWS; http://bit.ly/2rMPqj4 "

    This may be Watt's point of contention and urge to retain dividends...

     

    In addition, in 2014 FHFA directed the GSEs to set aside 4.2 basis points for each dollar of the unpaid principal balance of new business purchases (including but not limited to mortgages purchased for securitization) in each year to fund several federal affordable housing programs created by HERA, including the Housing Trust Fund and the Capital Magnet Fund. These set-asides were suspended by FHFA in November 2008 and were reinstated effective January 1, 2015. The 2018 Budget proposes to eliminate the 4.2 basis point set-aside and discontinue funding for these Funds, resulting in an increase to the estimated PSPA dividends

     

    My understanding is that Watt is not retaining dividends, he's delaying them. In the end they may wind up being the same thing though.

  11. very cursory treatment by judge atlas of the collins constitutional claim.  she knows collins will appeal, so she will let the apeals court handle this...likely after the dc circuit en banc in PHH...and maybe ultimately in scotus

     

    You really there's a chance SCOTUS takes this, takes any of this? I don't. But if it did, that must mean freedom. No reason why it would take any of it unless against US govt.

     

×
×
  • Create New...