Jump to content

FrankArabia

Member
  • Posts

    168
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FrankArabia

  1. I think you have to accept a certain lack of precision in this business, adjust your bet sizes accordingly, and hedge via cash, or otherwise to cover the inevitable failures.  Whether BB has done this or is walking around in a cloud of illusion is up for his shareholders to decide.

     

    Completely agree, to be clear though my issue is the dangerous concentration in predominantly highly leveraged financials in a risk fraught global economic environment that if memory serves, made up ~75% of AUM at one point. Maybe that's changed but it's not the nature of any one investment here, as much as much as its the construction of the portfolio as a whole and the correlation between holdings that I think is irresponsible.

     

    I think Buffet has spoken plenty of times against this type of thinking....so what if he is concentrated in financials? it makes absolutely no difference so long as he is right about the business in the long term...the financial system is safer than pre crisis at this stage....the world economy is weaker but that won't be forever...

  2. I am long AIG and agree with BB.

     

    Insurance/banks are risky per se, but that is why you perform security analysis to not just throw a blanket over it. I think however, most investors do hence their low valuaton.

     

    You can rip apart any investment, but the points in the article were not insightful if you actually read the annual reports of the respective companies and understand the industry.

     

     

  3. I think that's just the wrong way to look at it. Firms with declining moats can waste away their cash, and destroy value very quickly. I think it's a mistake to only look at it because it is "cheap"...rather you should focus on business model going into the future, that's where the margin of safety is. If you find strengths within Intel's business model that you feel will create value in the future, that is a different story.

     

    Are you long INTC?

     

    EDIT: I think MSFT is actually cheaper than INTC. It is trading at less than 10xFCFE, and you also have to take MSFT's 65B net cash pile into account.

     

    Yes long INTC @ 24.75. almost 5% but look to add after more research. I think there is a balance between cheapness/quality. won't get into INTC here. you probably know more about the tech stuff than I do so its not worth me rehashing info and debating whether they can enter the mobile space and whether ARM will eat its lunch.

     

    also your idea of margin of safety is not exactly correct. the margin of safety can come from 1) price 2) growth. I don't know what you mean by "margin of safety" by focusing on the business model. Please elaborate and give a quantitative example if possible. use MSFT since you own it, what is my margin of safety if I buy at $30.

     

     

  4. i'm just pulling your leg Gio....i like FFH and respect it as a long term holding. As the call highlights and as Prem has reiterated time and time again they're doing this for the long haul. Its one of the few Canadian investments i would consider owning in the future....

  5. Are there hidden assets here?

     

    Total assets here is about $130 million, equity is about $18 millon.

     

    This company may be able to generate $-15$20 million in a good year.

     

    Yet the company is selling for right now about $300 million.

     

    I must be missing something very big here. please fill me in.

     

  6. according to Chou Funds, the average cost per share is around $20...francis hasn't made it out of the woods yet with this stock.....

     

    i respect Francis a whole lot. any idea what the main thesis for this company is?

×
×
  • Create New...