vinod1 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 https://www.gmo.com/America/CMSAttachmentDownload.aspx?target=JUBRxi51IIBkzeMN6maT8U1%2fTdfZFUgg1mR%2b%2f01QLADkc%2bteJzsR%2bVfcC%2fSC%2btuA%2fvERm%2f47EsGV8Aeo3YQwhCgYpJJIz2rK%2fXue%2bib4lzo%3d Good letter but he loses me when he talks about presendential cycle. Vinod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jb85 Posted May 8, 2009 Share Posted May 8, 2009 i hear you about the presidential cycle, it may work but i just tend to ignore those sections of the letter, too short term. However overall, i think it is one of the better macro view newsletters out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arbitragr Posted May 8, 2009 Share Posted May 8, 2009 need to login ... can't access ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
netnet Posted May 8, 2009 Share Posted May 8, 2009 need to login ... can't access ??? All you have to do is register to get access. Interesting macro view, as always. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philassor Posted May 9, 2009 Share Posted May 9, 2009 thanks for the link; found the reading interesting/entertaining. I know that some of you hold grantham in high regards. In my humble opinion, I find his attempts to anticipate short term market moves as rather futile and contrary to ben graham and buffett's assertion that you cannot predict the market in the short term. there are too many moving parts and too much psychology and frivolous emotions involved for this kind of exercise. It is a little bit like making sense of a chaotic system in physics. good reading anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vinod1 Posted May 9, 2009 Author Share Posted May 9, 2009 This is not one of his better letters. You should read "The blackstone peak and the turning of the worm" and his other letters right at the peak of both 1999 and 2007 mania's. His methodology is pretty robust and for me he ranks right up with Buffett. The main underlying principle in his method is Mean Reversion which does not seem to be inconsistent with Graham. Vinod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now