spartansaver Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 Both businesses grow in-line with GDP - assume Invested Capital is $100. Business A averages a 10% ROIC and earns that every year without fail. Business B averages a 10% ROIC but earns -10% some years and +30% other years. What are these two earnings streams worth?
ValueArb Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 The intrinsic value is dependent upon some missing information 1) your risk free return rate, so without that can't do a DCF. 2) Are earnings dividended out or re-invested at the same ROIC? Valuing them relatively is pretty easy. Assuming you pay book value, and all earnings are retained by the business (tax free) in 20 years Business A reaches a book value of $672, while Business B (assuming alternating +30% and -10% years) reaches a book value of somewhere in the $470-$480 range. Plus Business A's consistent performance is evidence of a strong moat, while Business B's performance is evidence of a weak moat, or very cyclical industry. Now that was unfair to Business B, because alternating -10% and +30% years produces a 17% gain over those years instead of the 21% two +10% years produce. So in reality we need to alternate -10% and +34.44% years to get equal returns over alternating years. But even in that case I think you give Business A a higher relative value because moat and consistency mean future returns are more trustworthy.
jks327 Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 Business B sounds like a lot of companies in the aviation industry. I asked basically the same question the other day to a successful investor I know and he told me to throw away the rearview mirror
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now