Jump to content

Greg

Member
  • Posts

    46
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Greg

  1.   If you want a dividend in any amount you can create it and have a tax advantage.

      If, for example, you want a 3% dividend you can sell 3% of your stock each year. You will have a tax advantage over Berkshire paying the dividend unless your cost basis is 0.

      If you do not create a dividend because you think the stock will be worth more in the future, by a value exceeding the dividend, then you have answered the question and voted for Berkshire not paying a dividend.

  2.   If you look objectively at Gabelli's compensation I think you would conclude that he is underpaid. Either that or he sold the stock too cheap when he went public. Either way Gabelli got the short end of the deal. This is very different from Sardar Biglari.

  3. At last year's CAW annual meeting there were more votes withheld from Cooley than for him (1,460,853 votes for, 1,491,385 votes withheld). Sardar got 1,522,740 votes for, 1,429,498 votes withheld. Unusual for directors proposed by the company. I don't know if the tally for next week's annual meeting had anything to do with their resignations. See below from last year's 8-K report on voting.

     

    22-Jul-2013

     

    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders, Other Events

     

     

    Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

    At the annual meeting of the shareholders of CCA Industries, Inc. held on July 18, 2013, the following directors were elected by the Common Stock shareholders:

    Sardar Biglari - 1,522,740 votes for, 1,429,498 votes withheld Philip L. Cooley - 1,460,853 votes for, 1,491,385 votes withheld Drew Edell - 2,510,006 votes for, 442,232 votes withheld

     

    The following directors were elected by the Common Stock Class A shareholders:

    David Edell - 967,702 votes for, 0 votes withheld Stanley Kreitman - 967,702 votes for, 0 votes withheld Robert Lage - 967,702 votes for, 0 votes withheld Jonathan Rothschild - 967,702 votes for, 0 votes withheld

  4. From the back of OID: "The publisher, its affiliates and/or related parties may have a position in companies &/or monies invested with the managers discussed herein.  The publisher has numerous conflicts of interest and is actively seeking to establish additional ones as opportunities arise to do so."

  5. 10% would be OK if the starting value were the fair value of BH, not the book value which grossly understates fair value.

     

    All Sardar has to do to get his $10 million/year is to monetize assets that are currently carried on the books below fair value. He can do this year after year even if he never adds a penny of value to the company, even if he destroys value.

  6. I strongly oppose the new compensation plan.

     

    BH had a stated equity at July 7, 2010 of about $242 million. The market cap today is about $475 million. Maybe the company could be sold for $550 million. Under the proposed new compensation plan a big chunk of the $300 million difference between current book value and current fair market value would belong to Sardar when and how he chooses to harvest it.

     

    I think that the amended compensation plan should be defeated and the company should be sold without Sadar getting any of the difference between current book value and current fair market value. That way he will be making money with us, not off us.

     

    Then Sardar can do something with a different company and those of us who want to invest with him can, knowing more now than we did then.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...