Jump to content

basl1

Member
  • Posts

    113
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by basl1

  1. It is better to buy a good company at a fair price than a fair company at a good price

     

    I think critics don't understand the constraints under which Berkshire operates.

     

    The first principle is this: What's good for Berkshire is not necessarily good for others or individual investors. Berkshire is so big that it is seeking investments within a very narrow range of expected return. Seeking certainty and a modest return (more modest than most people would desire) is job #1 at Berkshire. Since it has low to no cost leverage, it can also seek investments yielding as little as 10% per year and it would still yield say 14-15% on shareholder equity. In this context, Burlington is within the Universe of stocks available and Very likely to meet the return expectations required.

     

    For this reason, Berkshire can pay this price that others would not find very appealing. Even Buffet has stated it isn't a bargain, but Berkshire does not need a bargain to achieve its goals. We, or Greenwald, on the other hand do need that and so might choose to pass on the investment.

     

    I can't believe intelligent investors like Greenwald (and even Niall Ferguson was critical of the deal on Charlie Rose) can't see something so obvious.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    I

×
×
  • Create New...