Jump to content

hardincap

Member
  • Posts

    750
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

hardincap's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • Dedicated
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. we need to protect elderly with very stringent precautionary measures for them. until recently, anyone could walk into a nursing facility. for the rest of us, all full steam ahead. i suspect its logistically impossible to selectively quarantine older folks, while very doable to shut down everything for two weeks or so. china showed this works. italy mandated shutdowns pretty late in the game but it seems we're doing it early enough to avert disaster
  2. @cherzeca check out where Italy was a few weeks back. The fear is we’ll have the same exploding growth, though I am cautiously optimistic that measures taken last few days will help us avoid the Italy nightmare scenario
  3. its pretty clear to me f&f are going to be building capital via earnings and then do a secondary offering. they may do a private placement in addition/prior to SPO but that is up to the companies, not calabria. on the face of it, his statements were positive--specifically that shareholders aren't going to be wiped out, 4th amendment is WIP, and there are legal hurdles that is WIP by treasury. BUT if there is an admin change, they might as well throw whatever plan they have out the window. maybe there is urgency behind closed doors because of this, maybe not, but i think markets are right in pricing this in.
  4. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/17/progressives-demand-kavanaugh-recuse-from-cfpb-supreme-court-case.html lets hope not
  5. dc circuit very liberal. warren-ites. calling CFPB unconstitutionally structured at scotus is an easy call imo. remember 12-4 in 5th C that fhfa is unconstitutionally structured. likely 5-4 in scotus, maybe kagan makes it 6-3 you're counting kavanaugh, but its very possible he'll recuse himself right?
  6. thanks cherzeca. its not obvious to me at all why SC will rule CFPB unconstitutional, when en banc upheld constitutionality 7-3 (not even close), overruling kavanaugh's opinion. can you pls elaborate?
  7. Have you spent significant amount of time on other ideas? If you haven’t bc of f&f then it’s costing you opportunities. There’s been some very compelling ideas discussed on here that have already significantly outperformed f&f this year (and last)
  8. I recall david thompson saying more than once in IU calls that they essentially tried to talk settlement
  9. @cherzeca why shouldnt SCOTUS take this up now on the basis that it is holding up housing reform and needs timely resolution? if they do, a SC ruling seems to be a game over move for both sides. would both parties be cooperative in coming to settlement terms before case is decided? edit: i think cooper & kirk have reached out to try to settle a number of times. im not so sure it makes sense for treasury to settle before SC ruling. that seems to make this very risky for Ps, if SC does take this up.
  10. @cherzeca your points are valid. i agree the dynamics have shifted powerfully, and sudden shifts like this tend to be under appreciated. maybe im suffering from gse fatigue, but i think at 50% par, I get better "return on time invested" elsewhere, esp given that the gses were always far outside my CoC. that time invested doesnt have to turn into a buy decision in a month or a year, but i know it will eventually pay off. opportunity cost of owning the prefs to me is time i could otherwise use to find the next 10-100 bagger. id be fooling myself if i said i can keep the gses and forget about them for the next year, given how quickly things can change. not necessarily risk: the correct way to invest is to put in the work and earn "secrets" that can translate into an edge in the markets
  11. @cherzeca 1. 30% appreciation in next 12 months is reasonable speculation, but still speculation. 2. at 10% par gse prefs were enticing enough to me to speculate; at 50% par, much less so. 3. far majority of my gains have come from long-term holdings in wonderful businesses, not special situations nor speculations. it's been way more enjoyable and instructive, as well. 4. speculating, even if the projected return in the near term is higher, just doesn't seem worth the opportunity cost of finding other wonderful businesses (even if they aren't cheap enough to buy now, there is value in identifying them now).
  12. +1000. Im pretty close to convincing myself to move on from this trade, because of this reason.
  13. Looks like prefs falling on bove issuing a bearish report calling prefs fully valued, reversing his long standing bullish outlook. Has anyone seen the report?
  14. @luke ortphopa and other uber bulls, what would you say is a prudent margin of safety for the prefs, to protect against unknown unknowns? 10%? 20%? Then adding time value of money, what price range do you consider the prefs still a buy?
×
×
  • Create New...