Jump to content

What are you buying today?


LowIQinvestor

Recommended Posts

Anyone buying OXY ahead of a buyout?

 

 

Warren Buffett has been buying bunches of Occidental Petroleum stock. Will he buy the whole thing?

 

That is the question that some investors are asking after the aggressive purchases by Berkshire Hathaway (Ticker: BRK/B) during the past two weeks of Occidental Petroleum (OXY) stock.

 

https://www.barrons.com/articles/oxy-stock-occidental-petroleum-warren-buffett-berkshire-hathaway-51647221753?mod=article_inline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Covered my AAPL short at $159. I went short back on December 15 at $178 and plowed the proceeds of the shortsale back into BRK.B (which is up ~17% in the meantime). I'm holding onto the BRK.B, used margin to cover AAPL short. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone have thoughts on the merger arb 12-13% spread(bid price $12) re $PGRE. Got the idea from SSI.

 

Trades at a cheap valuation with cap rates higher than average NY Office buildings and peers. Previous takeover attempt by Bow Street was rejected within 2 weeks but at a lowball price around 10. Pre announcement price of $9.3, but business is improving with dividend increase, even if deal falls through, don't think you lose much money, if any at all.

 

Current acquirer is Monarch, expert in the field of office R.E and now owns 5.5% stake purchased with average 9 bucks ish.

 

 

Edited by n.r98
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/17/2022 at 10:07 AM, RedLion said:

Covered my AAPL short at $159. I went short back on December 15 at $178 and plowed the proceeds of the shortsale back into BRK.B (which is up ~17% in the meantime). I'm holding onto the BRK.B, used margin to cover AAPL short. 

 

 

 

What's your strategy here?  Some sort of arb?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, bargainman said:

 

What's your strategy here?  Some sort of arb?


I’m experimenting in small doses with short selling. When I put this on in December I felt like AAPL was overextended, and I had a big indirect position through Berkshire Hathaway. So I sold aapl short and then rolled the short sale proceeds back into more Berkshire shares at around $280.
 

In the longer run I’m not an experienced short seller and it makes me uneasy remaining short on a great company like aapl even though it was only a partial hedge for the look through aapl stake from Berkshire Hathaway. It’s not a big position, so I decided to take a ~10% gain covering my short and will pay the margin back and hold the Berkshire shares long term. 
 

I have a big position in bam and I’ve been thinking of short selling bepc/bipc/bbuc to get more exposure to the asset management spinoff so I may experiment with a similar strategy here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/8/2022 at 4:27 PM, TwoCitiesCapital said:

 

Probably trying to be too smart, but sold April $183 calls against this.

 

Got about $5 of time value per contract and some downside protection since they're ITM by a few percent.

 

Kind of figured this may pull back some over the next month or so now that it's overbought and basically went vertical for a few days.  

 

Just want to take some gains off the table and get paid a little to wait for this to cool off a hair. Hoping for a retest of $180 sometimes around the time the Fed actually hikes rates. 

 

Buying these back.

 

Added SLV call spreads to my precious metals exposure now that the bottom should be in IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, bennycx said:

Had this on my watchlist for a long time too. Getting to more reasonable levels and they’re focusing on downsizing and buybacks 

 If SWK can make the 2022 forecast, the stock is cheap. I looked through my records and owned BDK in the past (around 2004) and it worked out well. SWK is a better business than BDK was in 2004 and it's not much more expensive.

 

I like their recent purchases MTD (Cub Cadet tractors) and Craftsman. Both are great brands and were bought for reasonable prices. I also like that they sold their security business for 16x EBITDA and use the proceeds to buy back their own stock at less than 10x EBITDA.

 

I do not like the look of the stock chart currently so I step in accordingly.

Edited by Spekulatius
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Spekulatius said:

SWK is a better business than BDK was in 2004 and it's not much more expensive.

 

I'm curious what you mean by "better business". In 2004, I feel like there were far fewer cheap Chinese brands, and so competition is harder today. On the other hand, they're bigger now and have Craftsman.

 

(I'm not skeptical of your "better business" statement. I'm just trying to figure out in my head how their positioning and competitive has evolved with the changing market, so was hoping you'd have some insight that would give me a shortcut to understanding what's going on.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, RichardGibbons said:

 

I'm curious what you mean by "better business". In 2004, I feel like there were far fewer cheap Chinese brands, and so competition is harder today. On the other hand, they're bigger now and have Craftsman.

 

(I'm not skeptical of your "better business" statement. I'm just trying to figure out in my head how their positioning and competitive has evolved with the changing market, so was hoping you'd have some insight that would give me a shortcut to understanding what's going on.)

I looked back and it seems like the profit margins have improved a little (from 11% in 2004 to 12.5%) so maybe not that much better than I thought. They have regained significant scale when they combined with Stanley, as well as the recent acquisition (MTD, Craftmans) so in that sense, I think they have become better or at least more diversified.

 

As for competitors - there was no name Chinese competition in 2004 as well. At some point it does  not matter if you have 3 or 10 no-name competitors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bought a starter in CPNG and some TELL (0.5% of portfolio).

 

Tellurian is a highly speculative, most likely binary, energy play. They have all the permits to start an LNG plant (driftwood) but have no funding to get it complete. With Europe looking to diversify nat gas sources and US and EU now establishing a partnership, this is now an interesting play. Few catalysts:

1) They break the ground and start building

2) They get a bank to give them a loan (I think the odds here increased, especially in light of the news on US/EU partnership)

3) CEO is a former co-founder of LNG so knows the game but doesn't have the best of reputations (despite lawsuit dismissal) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...