Jump to content

Rainy Day Fund


matjone

Recommended Posts

  A lot of personal finance advice says to keep 6 months or a year's expenses in savings.  I remember tweedy browne saying to keep 3 years worth - their reasoning was that 3 yrs was an a typical time frame for undervalued stocks to recover, so you would most likely never have to sell stocks at a loss to cover expenses in the event of job loss, etc.

 

Have you always followed this advice, especially in your early years?  To what extent?  I come pretty close to the 3 year rule (I have probably 30k expenses and keep about half of my 160k of funds in cash, other half in stocks), but sometimes I think that it is excessively conservative and I am just making myself poorer over time by keeping this money earning the currently pitiful return on cash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  A lot of personal finance advice says to keep 6 months or a year's expenses in savings.  I remember tweedy browne saying to keep 3 years worth - their reasoning was that 3 yrs was an a typical time frame for undervalued stocks to recover, so you would most likely never have to sell stocks at a loss to cover expenses in the event of job loss, etc.

 

Have you always followed this advice, especially in your early years?  To what extent?  I come pretty close to the 3 year rule (I have probably 30k expenses and keep about half of my 160k of funds in cash, other half in stocks), but sometimes I think that it is excessively conservative and I am just making myself poorer over time by keeping this money earning the currently pitiful return on cash.

 

6 months rule of thumb is more applicable to people who are at the accumulation stage of their life and 3 year rule of thumb is for those who are closer to retirement. 6 months expenses is for getting through to the next job if you lose the current one. 3 year expenses is to ensure that in retirement you are not liquidating your investments when they are down.

 

I personally prefer to squirrel away a few years expenses in inflation protected securities (I-Bonds accumulated at a time when they are offering 3.6%, 3% and 2% real returns - around 6-7% nominal currently - and limits are $60k per annum per family member). I learned to live with these returns and not be too greedy for part of my portfolio.

 

Vinod

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always had the feeling that the three year rule seemed a little high for people who are getting started.  For someone fresh out of college earning 60k or so and living where i live they'd probably have to wait 2 years or more to even get started investing, which would probably make a huge difference in their eventual net worth.

 

I am thinking about reducing it down to 2 year's expenses.  One good thing about the rule is that you get to reward yourself for reducing your expenses - for every dollar you cut expenses you free up three dollars for investments.  Of course only a freak would consider that a reward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you think it's complicated with just one person, imagine how complex it gets when you have a spouse and kids.  You really have to start modeling out scenarios.  What if I lose my job? What if my spouse?  What if we both lose our jobs?  Then there are the kids.  Losing a job would mean fewer daycare expenses.  Then under what scenario do you take the 6 month - 2 year fund?  Then you assign probabilities to the scenarios and their required funding requirements and come up with a number.  Kind of tricky since the best case scenario (6 months + lower income earner loses job) is an order of magnitude less than the worst case scenario (both lose our jobs + 2 years).  This is not a simple question at all unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it is true, every situation is different.  I have this fear that as soon as I go down to 6 months expenses great depression #2 will come and I'll be living in a tent like Tom Joad.  You have to balance that with the risk of doing like buffett said and waiting for the crash that never comes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep my personal finances and investments separated.  So for me at this point my investments don't provide any income, it gets reinvested.  This also means I don't count any investment cash as emergency fund cash or anything, although if dire straits came I could liquidate my portfolio and last a while.

 

So we aim for 6 months of expenses in cash and keep it in a bank account at a different institution from our investments.  This covers things like a big house emergency like a sewer backup with $10k of damage, to losing a job and needing to buy food for a few months.

 

I figured our savings needed by doing the following.  I took our monthly budget and eliminated things we wouldn't do in a job loss situation such as stashing away cash for a car purchase.  Then I took that core amount and multiplied by 6 and we saved that amount.  Sometimes it's nice to have an extra cushion with a life change like moving or having children, even if you don't use it you have that padding available.

 

If I was going to live off my portfolio I think three years would be a good goal, that and a paid off house.  I think those two together would eliminate a lot of the stress that might go with needing to generate an income, plus without a mortgage the expenses required should be a lot less.

 

I am a big fan of de-risking my life, low/no debt, having savings and keeping expenses low.  I guess I take the old man approach to life, try to be prudent in our finances.  This approach isn't for everyone, there are a lot of wealthy people on this board and if you have millions it probably doesn't matter if you have a mortgage or watch what you spend.  I am not wealthy, doubt I ever will be, so I take the old fashioned view on personal finances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I do too.  But I sometimes think about what Buffett would do -    I don't get the impression he ever kept much in savings until he got rich.

 

Hopefully you're wrong on your prediction about not getting wealthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...