vinod1 Posted March 27, 2010 Share Posted March 27, 2010 GMO has a new article on bubble developing in China. One tidbit - only two countries previously had as much in foreign currency reserves as a percent of GDP as China has now, US in 1929 and Japan in 1989. https://www.gmo.com/America/CMSAttachmentDownload.aspx?target=JUBRxi51IICi3XDk3kgShyaxnDe%2ft3GtNdfbW3V%2bu5X9OpjBFxQN1nv8Ys%2bCNCqeh9QLxflkBbA2yu17szUivY6GTiSswW%2bdKMPr52uvAJo%3d Vinod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pabraifan Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 Thanks OP. It is a great article, and I appreciate the posting. Does anyone know if there is there a way to short the Chinese property ? Thanks in advance for any answers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoodlum Posted March 29, 2010 Share Posted March 29, 2010 Thanks for the great article. I found the following comments most interesting and would suggest the 8% growth is no longer sustainable over the long run. Add to this the over supply in many sectors and it looks like China's growth will be pulling back soon. https://srv111.services.gc.ca/WordDefinition.aspx?id=Provisions Wall Street also tends to downplay the darker aspects of the Chinese demographic story. China’s population is set to decline in 2015. The worker participation rate will peak this year. It’s anticipated that the number of people joining the workforce will fall off quite rapidly. Yet it’s this section of the population that tends to move to the cities and has provided China with an apparently limitless supply of cheap labor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myth465 Posted March 30, 2010 Share Posted March 30, 2010 Thanks, a very good read. Here is the Krugman Article referenced in the Article and by Chanos http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/myth.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaf63 Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Great reading , Krugman's article written in 1994 is still relevant and could have been written recently. The big question , is how long can China keep it up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myth465 Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Im just glad Im learning about this now. I think its safe to say this is the next big bubble that we were all looking for. The problem is when and what causes it to pop. For now I am quick happy staying away from China centered investments. Though that would include the other BRICs, and commodity investments. Those pictures from the article are very telling and this definitely will be a rough one. China is creating a boom in Russia, Canada, Australia, and Brazil via commodities. If they crash then the world will slow down everywhere. I can see why they dont want to let the currency float. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bronco Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 I just finished "The Greatest Trade Ever" about John Paulson - great fun book IMO. I am so inspired now to short the next bubble. I am ready! Getting a little more serious - anyone have ideas on how to short China when the time is right? There must be better ways than shorting the FXI. It would be nice to get a dialogue going... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerbaron Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Maybe there is some Real Estate China companies listed on the Nasdaq or Amex (there is none in the NYSE... I checked). BeerBaron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasonw1 Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 view from another angle http://finance.yahoo.com/news/China-Real-Estate-Bubble-a-tsmf-3005546357.html?x=0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericd1 Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 I didn't find any Chinese real estate operations companies, but I found two real estate agency/brokers with ADRs. E-House Holdings Ltd (EJ) has a network of 3,500 sales agents in 28+ cities EJ is trading for $20 with estimated earnings of $1.10 this year and $1.40 next Ej has been profitable since '04. $0.62 in '07, $0.48 in '08 and $1.25 last year on sales of $80M. IFM Investments LTD (CTC) is a Century 21 franchisor operating in 34 cities with 4.7M property listings CTC is trading for $7 with estimated earning of $0.65 this year and $1.00 next CTC lost money in '06, '07 & '08 -$.015, -$0.69 & -$1.25 respectively. They made $0.46 last year ('09) as sales more than doubled to $95M. I don't see either as a bargain, or significantly overvalued... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rabbitisrich Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 Thanks, a very good read. Here is the Krugman Article referenced in the Article and by Chanos http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/myth.html Thanks for that article, but as I understand, much of China's growth in the last two decades comes from growth in total factor productivity. Also, China does some very smart things like leverage its monopoly over rare minerals to lure high-tech manufacturing and the accompanying talent. If you factor in China's emphasis on high level science and math education, and the below average labor participation rate of Chinese women, there is a good argument for China's long-term prospects. Can someone link the Chanos presentation that has been so influential? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rabbitisrich Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharperDingaan Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 You might want to look at what occurrs when you overlay demographics on top of the input/output approach. While social organization remains a factor (usually by replacing tradition with a more 'cash' orientated outlook), there were also just a lot more 'new' people to start with. The forced lower birth rate (one-kid policy), matricidal practice (girl babies are drowned), & hostile work conditions (deaths to accidents, toxic fumes reducing fertility, & accumulated toxins disabling workers early) virtually guarantees that in 10-15 yrs the chinese domestic workforce will be a lot smaller than it is now (assuming no foreign worker imports); & that it will stay low. With fewer kids to take care of ageing parents (tradition), & fewer fertile women to have kids with, material social unrest is almost assured. And the 'party' has historically not reacted all that favourably to unrest. You have to think that the best 'export' will be young people independently setting up (& investing) in the 'West', & that the most prominent 'import' will be the gradual repatriation of the BOP surplus. The best 'investment' is a chinese minority partner in your NA business; and an approach very similar to the 'sea-turtle' reality of Japan. SD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now