Jump to content

Russia-Ukrainian War


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, cubsfan said:

^^^ It's fun listening to you whine about Israel - a sliver of land surrounded by religious fanatics devoted to destroying them. So much for protecting yourself. Is it any wonder that the 1M or so Arabs that live

in Israel have no interest in leaving to live in the hellhole Arab nations around them?

 

Talk about re-writing history..

 

Cubsfan, 

Grow up & stop whining just because someone uttered the word Israel.

 

Good thing I stated they had won their land fair and square. Victors had always written their own narrative from the dawn of mankind, whether wars were just or not. If nothing else, get that through your head.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Xerxes said:

Cycles of violence. Worth looking at the history Franco-German conflicts. Same year might be off.

 

- 1806: Napoleonic invasion and subjugation of Prussia

 

- 1815: Battle of Waterloo: everyone knows about Duke of Wellington, little people know that there would be no Waterloo without Blucher and his Prussian seeking revenge.

 

- 1870-72: Creation of German Empire and the elevation of King of Prussia to Kaiser. This was done in the famed Hall of Mirrors in the Versailles Palace in France, after Otto von Bismarck had Napoleon III on the run. Loss of Alsac-Lorraine territories

 

- 1914-18: French re-took the Alsac-Lorraine territories. In 1918, Maraschal Foch and his German counterpart sign the armistice in his train carriage (which i believe was his warcarriage). Treaty of Versailles few years later (1921?) and subjugation of Germany. The treaty was signed in the very same hall of mirrors where German Empire was proclaimed.

 

- 1939-40: German conquest of France. French surrended signed in the very same train carriage that Foch took German's cease-fire. After that Hitler had the train carriage destroyed and in his mind the shame was forever removed.

 

In Sept 1984, severn decades after the start of the First World War, German Chancellor Kohl and French President Mitterrand held hands. That is 178 years from the Napoleonic invasions.

 

Think of everychild now in Ukraine and one of them is thinking ....

 

image.png.703c361b7588f391270c391159631385.png

 

 

 

 

1945: Russia demands, and is ceded, the Prussian capital Königsberg...... to the victors, go the spoils.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hellowod said:

Why would China even dare to help Russia directly on its war effort?

China will try to benefit from this, buy some cheap oil/LNG from the Russian etc. but I think they will stay as far away from trouble as they can. This is not their fight and when have you ever seen them helping another country when they had no direct interest or benefit?

They are also seeing the response from the west and draw their own conclusions. Besides this, every Chinese company that does business with Russia has to weigh the cost benefit of doing business there or doing business with the west. That will be looked at case by case and I think it is possible that companies like state owned business do some bartering with Russians, because they have got nothing to lose. Most others will be quite careful, they have seen what happened to Huawei.

Edited by Spekulatius
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Spekulatius said:

China will try to benefit from this, buy some cheap oil/LNG from the Russian etc. but I think they will stay as far away from trouble as they can. This is not their fight and when have you ever seen them helping another country when they had no direct interest or benefit?

They are also seeing the response from the west and draw their own conclusions. Besides this, every Chinese company that does business with Russia has to weigh the cost benefit of doing business there or doing business with the west. That will be looked at case by case and I think it is possible that companies like state owned business do some bartering with Russians, because they have got nothing to lose. Most others will be quite careful, they have seen what happened to Huawei.

 

WSJ had an article today about China having interest in buying stakes in companies like Gazprom. 

 

You can bet that they'll eventually buy oil at a discount from Russia (just like they do Iran) and that they'll take a pound of flesh in strategic equity ownership in these companies now that valuations have been decimated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Xerxes said:

 

Cubsfan, 

Grow up & stop whining just because someone uttered the word Israel.

 

Good thing I stated they had won their land fair and square. Victors had always written their own narrative from the dawn of mankind, whether wars were just or not. If nothing else, get that through your head.

 

 

 

Listen to you. So you go on your little rampage trashing the Israeli's for their right to exist.

I can't help it that the Arabs and Persian leaders have nothing better to do than  kill each

other and plant roadside bombs everywhere.  But you go right ahead and justify it, since 

it makes you feel better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You got to be f&&&ing kidding me.

 

I talked about Russia, Ukraine, genocides in Rwanda, Burma, former Yoguslavia etc. I talked about fucking Gorbachov, I talked about Franco-German wars, the mongoles, Golden horde in Crimea, U.S. foreign policy, I talked about how Trump's greatest achievement was to create peace between the Arabs and Israel, ... but the moment someone makes a comment about Israel and its lands, you get all the retards in the world, rolling over themselves up to draw red lines around Israel and profess their support.

 

No comments about children being thrown in the fires in Burma ,,, that is all good.

But we fuc*ing cannot talk about Israel.

 

Let's get this clear and see if we can through your head => Israel won its lands through wars of conquest. PERIOD. There is nothing wrong with that. PERIOD. And it doesnt matter who started the war, Nasser or "name the Arab tyrant" of the day. PERIOD. They have it now and as far as I am concerned they can keep it, since they are better steward than the alternative. PERIOD. But doesnt change the fact that they are responsible for popluation there yet they seem to have no problem treating Palestinean like shit and throwing them out of their home for fun. PERIOD. Are Palestineans any better, nope, since they refuse to accept the inveitable for decades. PERIOD.

 

Now, that doesnt change the fact that everytime someone says "israel", retards line up to support and profess their love for Israel. PERIOD. That is what it means controlling the NARRATIVE. 

 

Who knows maybe 50 years from now, in an unlikely scenario that Russia somehow keeps swaths of Ukraine and de-populates some of the cities and replace the locals with Russians and throws them out of their home, we would be so tired & numb of seeing footages Ukrainian throwing stones to Russian troops that we wont care either.

 

Now, now, now before you get too excited to point out the difference between Russian naked aggression in Ukraine and Israeli wars to defend itself in 1967 and 1973, no one is making that comparision. But the END RESULTS is the same, a population controlling (subjugating) another and making rules. Hence wars of conquest.

 

If this cannot get through your biased, brainwashed head, nothing else can. PERIOD.

I am done with this thread. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said - go right ahead and defend Fatah, Hamas and Hezbollah. Keep lobby those bombs into

Israel - because in reality - they don't have a right to exist. Cause those Israelis just bull doz Palestinian 

homes for fun. Of course, you have NO explanation for all the Arab neighbors that stick those

poor Palestinians into refugee camps because they want nothing to do with them. Their are plenty

of Palestinians that live in Israel PEACEFULLY, side by side Christians & Jews. What a fucking concept!

 

And those Palestinians are so terribly subjugated that they never leave. And just think, all the

Jews ask is - how 'bout you stop killing people? IS that too much too ask!

 

OF course it's all Israel's fault!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Xerxes makes a decent point..and I think he is being rather unbias about it. I think he made it pretty clear he isnt singling out Israel. 

 

To ask why the Palestinians dont leave is to ask the same question as to why the Ukranians dont just leave...

 

Also, the Israeli-Arab conflict has gone on for so long now that it has made it more difficult IMO. Generations on both sides seeing friends/family killed creates blood feuds, thats hard to stop. 

 

As Xerxes said, to the victor goes the spoils..and as he has said, this is a common thread throughout history, survival of the fittest, all the empires of the world were built/taken...Here in the US vs the British, the Indians, the civil war...when there is a dispute that cant be resolved diplomatically it comes to fisticuffs and the stronger opponent wins and gets his way..

 

I dont think its Isreals "fault" and I dont think Xerxes is saying that any more than the US expansion to the west "displaced" the native tribes, or the Dutch/Roman/British empires were at "fault" for their expansion, at least thats not how I am reading his statements...it just is what it is man.

 

Throughout history, "I will do what I want, and unless you are stong enough to stop me, tough shit"...thats human nature. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^ Gimme a break. The Palestinians don't leave Israel because it's the safest and best place to live 

precisely BECAUSE the Israeli's are in charge. You think they want to live in the hell hole West Bank, Jordan,

Gaza or Lebanon with the criminals terrorist Fatah, Hezbollah or Hamas in charge? Really?

 

The displaced Palestinians have been offered their own homeland AND peace 3X since 1999 - and of course

the criminals terrorist WILL NOT ALLOW IT. Those are the facts - and you can't change them with this 

stupid "narrative" bullshit.  The only "peace" that the Iranian backed criminals will accept is for Israel

to be wiped off the map.

 

The Palestinians can have peace, prosperity , jobs and safety IF they just stop killing people. PERIOD.


Seems that what the term "civilization" actually means.

Edited by cubsfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TwoCitiesCapital said:

 

WSJ had an article today about China having interest in buying stakes in companies like Gazprom. 

 

You can bet that they'll eventually buy oil at a discount from Russia (just like they do Iran) and that they'll take a pound of flesh in strategic equity ownership in these companies now that valuations have been decimated. 

All that stuff doesn't sound like a win for China. Basically they "may" get some cheap Russian assets, but lose the goodwill of Europe, which they at least need to be semi-independent rather than for Europe to be more dependent on the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with @cubsfan here as far as Palastinians are concerned. I think the rest the world would be a whole lot more sympathetic to their plight if they would govern themselves decently, but even their own leadership doesn’t have any control about what they are doing - like firing their rockets from their density populated Gaza Strip to Israel and then complaining when something comes back.

Fact is their Arabian brothers in Jordan or Egypt don’t want the Palestinians either, because they are at best trouble makers and at worst just plain terrorists.

 

Just look at how Jassir Arafad was effed off with Polonium most likely and we all know where this usually comes from. Successor claimed natural causes, nothing to investigate.

 

 

Edited by Spekulatius
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hellowod said:

All that stuff doesn't sound like a win for China. Basically they "may" get some cheap Russian assets, but lose the goodwill of Europe, which they at least need to be semi-independent rather than for Europe to be more dependent on the US.

 

Goodwill? Does China have goodwill? They basically disregarded the prior treaty regarding Hong Kong, have committed genocides of their own, have acted aggressively militarily over contested regions, and buddies up with enemies (a la Russia and Iran). Now we're all contemplating whether or not they'll invade Hong Kong. 

 

What goodwill do you imagine they have? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's so wrong about being a neutral country, prospering from trade agreements in both directions? It will take a long time to heal the wounds of this war though.

 

But what's the alternative? Russia biting off the eastern part of the country, including Kiev/Kyiv, a demilitarized zone and border like North/South Korea?

 

DraftUkraineCoTMarch8,2022.png

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Putin’s Endgame Starts to Look Like Reducing Ukraine to Rubble

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-09/vladimir-putin-s-ukraine-invasion-stares-down-brutal-endgame?srnd=premium&sref=7zqHEcxJ

 

As I mentioned many posts above this is not an invasion and occupation happening in Ukraine right now............this is a demolition crew sent to level Ukraine such that it will be no fit partner for anyone EU/NATO/USA for decades and by extension its buffer state status (& Russian security) will be restored.

Edited by changegonnacome
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, changegonnacome said:

Putin’s Endgame Starts to Look Like Reducing Ukraine to Rubble

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-09/vladimir-putin-s-ukraine-invasion-stares-down-brutal-endgame?srnd=premium&sref=7zqHEcxJ

 

As I mentioned many posts above this is not an invasion and occupation happening in Ukraine right now............this is a demolition crew sent to level Ukraine such that it will be no fit partner for anyone EU/NATO/USA for decades and by extension its buffer state status (& Russian security) will be restored.

 

Won't this result in the US and Western Europe pumping in money to rebuild Ukraine? Won't Ukraine then be such a close partner they become part of the EU and maybe a NATO member?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, boilermaker75 said:

Won't this result in the US and Western Europe pumping in money to rebuild Ukraine? Won't Ukraine then be such a close partner they become part of the EU and maybe a NATO member?

 

Money YES........EU/NATO membership not a chance in hell or in my lifetime now......this is the point of the invasion (demolition).

 

Think about this:

 

Question What has the EU/NATO/USA learned about Ukraine from this crisis?

Answer:

(1) That Russia cares ALOT about Ukraine remaining a neutral buffer state, that Putin/Russia views NATO/EU/USA encroachment into Ukraine as an existential crisis (ala Cuban Missle crisis) and is willing to spend blood, bullets & suffer severe economic damage to stop that happening.

(2) The EU/NATO/USA has learned a lesson too about its self - that it thought it cared about Ukraine but has discovered that it cares not enough to spend a single drop of blood defending it.

(3) Russia, has reminded the West, that it may be declining state but nonetheless a thermonuclear one.

(4) The United States, has been reminded, that meddling in Ukraine and enraging a thermonuclear power like Russia is both futile (cause the US has no intention of ever defending Ukraine because it isn't strategically important to US foreign policy) and that its wasting time/resources & mental overhead when the real threat to American sovereignty & security is in Asia with China, not Eastern Europe & the husk of the USSR called Russia.

(5) Geopolitical battles by sovereign thermonuclear nations in foreign territories where that country/territory is NOT strategically important to that power are usually decided by one factor and one factor alone - RESOLVE - or put another way who cares more......for example Afghanistan......not strategically important to the United States - who cared more about controlling Afghanistan the United States or the Taliban? Who had the greater resolve? We got the answer.....and history is littered with these.  OK who has the greater resolve in Ukraine????? - Russia or the EU/NATO/USA? Is Ukraine strategically important to the EU/NATO/USA? is it strategically important to Russia? Answer - Russia clearly has the greater resolve here and the EU/NATO/USA has been reminded it doesn't. Coming out of this crisis it would be politically stupid for the EU/NATO to make overtures again to Ukrainian accession.....build it up economically sure but the EU/NATO will realize that Ukraine needs to remain neutral (for all the reasons i listed above) and a realistic Ukrainian political/economic aspiration after this war is over , should be to become the Switzerland of the Eastern Europe (not an EU/NATO member, this is dumb as we've found out).

(6) What has Ukraine learned??..........that geography is destiny......for 24 million Ukrainian to prosper it needs to have good relations with the EU/NATO/USA AND Russia simultaneously. This is Ukrania's lot in life, the cards it was dealt at birth.....wise political leaders play the hand they're dealt, not the cards they wish they had.

Edited by changegonnacome
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some more background on the Azov regiment fighting in Ukraine.

Seems like the West has no problem supporting these guys.

 

 

https://time.com/5926750/azov-far-right-movement-facebook/

Within days of his release, Biletsky set out to assemble a far-right militia. “That was our rise to the surface after a long period underground,” Biletsky told TIME in an interview that winter in Ukraine. The insignia he chose for the militia combined two symbols—the “black sun” and the “wolf’s hook”—both of which were used by the German Nazis during World War II.

Among the militias that formed to resist the Russian forces, Biletsky’s followers turned out to be among the most disciplined and battle-ready. “They held the line even after everybody left,” says Serhiy Taruta, a metals magnate and former governor of the frontline region of Donetsk who helped finance and equip Azov in the early months of the war. For their bravery on the battlefield, Biletsky and other Azov commanders were lauded as national heroes. “These are our best warriors,” then President Petro Poroshenko said at an award ceremony in 2014. “Our best volunteers.”

From across Europe and the U.S., dozens of fighters came to join Azov that year, many of them bearing tattoos and rap sheets earned in the neo-Nazi underground back home. The Ukrainian authorities welcomed many of them, and in some cases granted them citizenship. Within the war’s first year, Biletsky’s militia was officially absorbed into the National Guard, becoming a regiment within Ukraine’s armed forces.

 

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/1/who-are-the-azov-regiment

In January 2018, Azov rolled out its street patrol unit called National Druzhyna to “restore” order in the capital, Kyiv. Instead, the unit carried out pogroms against the Roma community and attacked members of the LGBTQ community.

Ukraine is the world’s only nation to have a neo-Nazi formation in its armed forces,” a correspondent for the US-based magazine, the Nation, wrote in 2019.

 

In June 2015, both Canada and the United States announced that their own forces will not support or train the Azov regiment, citing its neo-Nazi connections.

The following year, however, the US lifted the ban under pressure from the Pentagon.

In October 2019, 40 members of the US Congress led by Representative Max Rose signed a letter unsuccessfully calling for the US State Department to designate Azov as a “foreign terrorist organisation” (FTO). Last April, Representative Elissa Slotkin repeated the request – which included other white supremacist groups – to the Biden administration.image.thumb.png.1c39aadf388a5b87e648f1546b0bad04.png

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russia is badly damaged by this conflict. It's clear that Russia doesn't know how to execute a 21st century war where the world participates on social media. The world is seeing in real time the incompetance of the Russian military. I don't know if the images of tanks being towed by tractors and helicopters being shot down are real but they are destroying the image of Russian military superiority and emboldening adversaries.

 

Russia's partnership with China looks very unbalanced. Russia's position is extremely weak and vulnerable to Chinese demands. China's supply chains gain an advantage in access to raw materials. The sanctions will drive up input costs for every other major manufactoring country.

 

The EU is temporarily aligned with the US on security. This probably won't last given the EU's dependency on Russian oil and gas. A big question is whether the Ukraine will be able to accelerate developing their own oil and gas in the Black sea. This would be another major problem for Russia. 

 

I think that China is going to come out stronger. Their supply chains will have an advantage in access to raw materials from Russia. The sanctions will drive up the input costs of manufacturing for everyone but China. Japan and South Korea will be disavantaged. The US will import more than ever from China. 

 

 

Edited by brianr27
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would people peg as the odds, say we were running a bookie operation, that ANYTHING neutral or sharing the Russian POV here can be found in a MSM piece? Not saying I support them, but if I was looking for an unbiased way to see both sides of this thing, anyone think I could get it in the good old US of A? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gregmal said:

What would people peg as the odds, say we were running a bookie operation, that ANYTHING neutral or sharing the Russian POV here can be found in a MSM piece? Not saying I support them, but if I was looking for an unbiased way to see both sides of this thing, anyone think I could get it in the good old US of A? 

 

Does this qualify?  https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/why-john-mearsheimer-blames-the-us-for-the-crisis-in-ukraine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Spekulatius said:

China will try to benefit from this, buy some cheap oil/LNG from the Russian etc. but I think they will stay as far away from trouble as they can. This is not their fight and when have you ever seen them helping another country when they had no direct interest or benefit?

They are also seeing the response from the west and draw their own conclusions. Besides this, every Chinese company that does business with Russia has to weigh the cost benefit of doing business there or doing business with the west. That will be looked at case by case and I think it is possible that companies like state owned business do some bartering with Russians, because they have got nothing to lose. Most others will be quite careful, they have seen what happened to Huawei.

 

This is not correct. China is OVERPAYING Russia for the oil, wheat etc, according to a few recent announcements. The goal seems to explicitly put oil onto the fire. I think they believe this puts China in a superior position when the US sanction is not helpful without China's collaboration. The strategy is definitely working, and Biden is reportedly begging president Xi to help. I think China wants to use this strategy to get some good concession from the US.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it is increasingly looking like Putin made a historic mistake. He has a military disaster unfolding in Ukraine. He has an economic disaster unfolding in Russia. He has united Europe. He has made NATO imperative; all of Europe is in the process of re-arming. And time is his enemy - things are only going to get worse with each passing day. His military is not prepared for a long drawn out war. And Russians will not long tolerate the economic depression that is unfolding. Most importantly, he has exposed himself to the world for all to see. Hard to put lipstick on that pig. 

Edited by Viking
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Viking said:

Well it is increasingly looking like Putin made a historic mistake. He has a military disaster unfolding in Ukraine. He has an economic disaster unfolding in Russia. He has united Europe. He has made NATO imperative; all of Europe is in the process of re-arming. And time is his enemy - things are only going to get worse with each passing day. His military is not prepared for a long drawn out war. And Russians will not long tolerate the economic depression that is unfolding. Most importantly, he has exposed himself to the world for all to see. Hard to put lipstick on that pig. 

Agree with everything that you are saying except for Russians will not long tolerate the economic depression that is unfolding.  USSR tolerated Stalin - who murdered 10-25% of the population, and jailed another 5-10%?  People were literally starving to death thanks to his policies and yet nobody rebelled.  I wish you were right though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...