Jump to content

Examples of prescient analysis

Recommended Posts

Wanted to compile good reports on multi-baggers. Some pitches that come to mind are Dominoes in 2011, XPEL in 2018, Hawaiian Holdings 2012, Microsoft in 2011 and Apple in 2016. With hindsight being 20/20 nearly all these valuations were far too conservative. What is your "meat of the bone" opinion on what characteristics they share? Please add your own to the list.







Link to post
Share on other sites

I posted this at the time in the AAPL thread, but talk about prescient!





This one I also thought was not just well done, but ballsy given how outrageous some of the stuff that was occurring around this company and some of the "participants" was. Definition of contrarian, definition of a pair of grapefruits.




EDIT: Add these two as well.





Link to post
Share on other sites

A few more:


https://www.valueinvestorsclub.com/idea/CAMBIUM_LEARNING_GROUP_INC/8176075446  [The author posts here from time to time]




I doubt there's one common characteristic that each of these analyses shares.  It may be useful to compare the company's actual business performance to how the narrative evolved over time.  For example, with Xpel, there are VIC writeups from 2013, 2015, 2018 and 2019 and a thread on this board that began many years ago.  The share price also didn't go straight up during that period; someone who bought at points in 2015 was sitting on a 50% loss three years later, with more severe declines in between.  How much did the business's underlying trajectory change versus the market perception of the business (evidenced by share price multiple) change?  To the extent it's the latter, why caused the market perception change? 


EDIT:  You can also look at the US cable/broadband companies.  This was a very well known business (Malone, Cable Cowboys, etc.), yet investors have made boatloads of money in it over the last 6-7 years.  Writeup examples:






Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for sharing guys. While these are rare, I love getting an idea of what people were thinking at that point in time. Seems like it was extremely obvious to the analyst in each case (based on verbiage), and thesis seemed to be pretty simple. Kind of like the Buffett adage (has to hit you over the head).   

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know what I was thinking. I felt there was risk that MA and V could be disrupted. That was clearly not the case, but I think many fellow investors made the same mistake.


Again, if you were correct about the duration of the moat, being off a bit on valuation didn’t really matter. At current multiples ( roughly 3x what they were back then) I don’t think that’s the case any more though.


With current valuation multiples, I would argue that investing in MA or V is just a bet on low interest rates.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 5 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Create New...