jmp8822 Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 Can someone point me to the website(s) where the most recent drafts of the tax bill from the House and Senate are posted, i.e. the ones they are voting on? I can't seem to find it easily with a google search. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkbabang Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/1/text Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Eriksen Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 Senate Finance committee version. https://www.finance.senate.gov/taxreform Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Eriksen Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 I received an email form TD Ameritrade that the Senate bill has a FIFO requirement on all stock transactions. Interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DooDiligence Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 I received an email form TD Ameritrade that the Senate bill has a FIFO requirement on all stock transactions. Interesting. Yeah, gotta be one of the stupidest f'ing things in the proposal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rb Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 I received an email form TD Ameritrade that the Senate bill has a FIFO requirement on all stock transactions. Interesting. Yeah, gotta be one of the stupidest f'ing things in the proposal. There's nothing stupid about it. I suspect it's actually pretty smart. This provision should bump up tax receipts from capital gains. That in turn will help with scoring of the bill and parliamentary procedures/restrictions (the 1.5 trillion cap). Scoring is similar to saving... every little helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cameron Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 I received an email form TD Ameritrade that the Senate bill has a FIFO requirement on all stock transactions. Interesting. Yeah, gotta be one of the stupidest f'ing things in the proposal. There's nothing stupid about it. I suspect it's actually pretty smart. This provision should bump up tax receipts from capital gains. That in turn will help with scoring of the bill and parliamentary procedures/restrictions (the 1.5 trillion cap). Scoring is similar to saving... every little helps. It might not be stupid but it is hypocritical seeing as this seems to go against the anti-regulatory stance Republicans are taking. Also exempting hedge funds and mutual funds after they threw a fit and lobbied them is interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cameron Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 i feel like an anti-pro choice joke could have been made, but I didn't feel it would be in good taste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rb Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 HA! Republicans being hypocritical. That's a new one lol. Anyway, I think this may have some significant impacts in some corners. On this corner for example I think Berkshire will divest of a good chunk of Wells Fargo before this passes through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cigarbutt Posted December 2, 2017 Share Posted December 2, 2017 Still at the looking for facts stage. Thought the following was relevant. http://blog.yardeni.com/2017/11/corporate-taxes-facts-vs-fiction.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnarkyPuppy Posted December 2, 2017 Share Posted December 2, 2017 I received an email form TD Ameritrade that the Senate bill has a FIFO requirement on all stock transactions. Interesting. Yeah, gotta be one of the stupidest f'ing things in the proposal. Do you see this in the final bill? I can't find it anywhere Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalledStrikes Posted December 2, 2017 Share Posted December 2, 2017 It is only in the Senate version. I find it amazingly hypocritical that it only impacts individual investors. The mutual funds industry was able to lobby an exclusion when it first came out last month, so they are exempted. Can you imagine how this will be implemented? I have multiple brokerage accounts? Must I sell only from the account where I made the first purchase? What if I own shares in an IRA that are older than shares in a taxable account? Would I have to sell from the IRA first? (That may seem like a stretch - but wash sale rules don't distinguish between IRAs and taxable accounts - so why would this legislation). For the record, I have no objections to paying more income tax if the money is used to pay down the national debt, but if the discussion is about why I should pay more so that someone else gets a bigger tax break, then I can be as petty and territorial as the next guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scorpioncapital Posted December 2, 2017 Share Posted December 2, 2017 Trust me, the hypocrisy in America is nothing compared to countries were literally if you have any amount of capital you can avoid paying any tax altogether, and virtually no capital taxes. I'm surprised not everyone is piling into these nations - although they are to some degree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now