KinAlberta Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 Interesting... Zacks sell news is always popping up on the companies I'm just getting interested in. How should their ratings performance be rated? I hope someone revisits this post in say 3, 5 maybe 10 years to compare their picks to BRK. :-) Also, this Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) stock did not witness any positive earnings estimate revision in the last 60 days. The Zacks Consensus Estimate lost 5.6% for 2016 and 7.9% for 2017 over the last 8 weeks. Additionally, shares of Berkshire Hathaway seem expensive as its P/E is 19.3% higher than the industry average of 16.2%. ... Assured picks Since insurance stocks are poised for growth no matter what the Fed chooses to do, the space is bound to attract attention. Here, we always look to maximize our return on investment, with Berkshire or Warren Buffet being the guiding star. Taking nothing away from Berkshire, we have picked some solid operators in the space that have the potential to boost one’s portfolio even more. ... https://finance.yahoo.com/news/3-insurance-stocks-buy-instead-194507128.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
augustabound Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 People still look at Zacks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marlinls Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Zacks are idiots, and thats saying something good about them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marlinls Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 i have looked at Zacks with many companies over time and they are mostly wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KinAlberta Posted April 15, 2016 Author Share Posted April 15, 2016 Zacks reporting sounds like ValueLine's self promotion. Years ago I looked at ValueLine's reported performance and found it hard to believe. Then some funds started up mimicking their #1 rankings and they sure weren't stellar performers. The Value Line Enigma Jul 30, 2010 My book was published in 2000, so I have updated the data (all returns are for the 10-year period ending June 30): ... http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-value-line-enigma/ ZACKS RANK PERFORMANCE Following the Zacks Rank has proved to be very profitable. Since 1988, a portfolio constructed of Zacks #1 Rank stocks has generated an average annual return of 26%. Comparatively, the S&P 500 has only returned 10% over the same period. http://www.zacks.com/help/zrankguide.php?p=7 The Zacks #1 Rank List is the best place to start your stock search. And now you can see all 220 Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks when you start a free trial to Zacks Premium. This private list narrows a universe of 4,400 stocks down to 5% with the most potential. Access this exclusive roster of "best in class" picks that since 1988, has nearly tripled the S&P 500 with an average gain of more than +25% per year. To put it another way, had you invested $10,000 into our Zacks Rank system in 1988 and rebalanced monthly, it could have compounded to nearly $6 million dollars. The numbers don't lie. In fact, that amazing performance has been examined and attested by the independent accounting firm of Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP.* http://www.zacks.com/registration/premium/login/?continue_to=%2Fstocks%2Fbuy-list%2F Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Hjorth Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 Interesting... Zacks sell news is always popping up on the companies I'm just getting interested in. How should their ratings performance be rated? I hope someone revisits this post in say 3, 5 maybe 10 years to compare their picks to BRK. :-) Also, this Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) stock did not witness any positive earnings estimate revision in the last 60 days. The Zacks Consensus Estimate lost 5.6% for 2016 and 7.9% for 2017 over the last 8 weeks. Additionally, shares of Berkshire Hathaway seem expensive as its P/E is 19.3% higher than the industry average of 16.2%. ... Assured picks Since insurance stocks are poised for growth no matter what the Fed chooses to do, the space is bound to attract attention. Here, we always look to maximize our return on investment, with Berkshire or Warren Buffet being the guiding star. Taking nothing away from Berkshire, we have picked some solid operators in the space that have the potential to boost one’s portfolio even more. ... https://finance.yahoo.com/news/3-insurance-stocks-buy-instead-194507128.html Long term BRK investors do not bother about Zacks recommendations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KinAlberta Posted April 19, 2016 Author Share Posted April 19, 2016 Ilumina is currently down nearly 24% today, so when I saw what Zacks said yesterday, I just had to have some fun (at Zack's expense) and post it here. (earnings vs revenue outlook) Is a Surprise Coming for Illumina (ILMN) This Earnings Season? April 18, 2016 by Zacks Equity Research Published on April 18, 2016 "Why is this Important? A positive reading for the Zacks Earnings ESP has proven to be very powerful in producing both positive surprises, and outperforming the market. Our recent 10 year backtest shows that stocks that have a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) or better show a positive surprise nearly 70% of the time, and have returned over 28% on average in annual returns (see more Top Earnings ESP stocks here). " http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/213577/is-a-surprise-coming-for-illumina-ilmn-this-earnings-season Illumina (ILMN): Stock Poised to Beat Q1 Earnings by Zacks Equity Research Published on April 18, 2016 "Why a Likely Positive Surprise? Our proven model shows that the company is likely to beat earnings because it has the right combination of two key ingredients. Zacks ESP: Illumina has an Earnings ESP of +1.28%. That is because the Most Accurate estimate is 79 cents while the Zacks Consensus Estimate is pegged lower at 78 cents. This is a meaningful and leading indicator of a likely positive earnings surprise. Zacks Rank: Illumina has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). Note that stocks with a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 have a significantly higher chance of beating earnings estimates. Conversely, Sell-rated stocks (Zacks Rank #4 or 5) should never be considered going into an earnings announcement. The combination of Illumina’s Zacks Rank #3 and +1.28% ESP makes us confident of an earnings beat at the company." http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/213549/illumina-ilmn-stock-poised-to-beat-q1-earnings?cid=CS-SEEKAPH-FT-213549&source=sa Today's news: First Zacks: Illumina (ILMN): Bleak Q1 Preliminary Results Hurt Stock by Zacks Equity Research Published on April 19, 2016 "Finally, it is rather difficult to predict Illumina’s first-quarter 2016 performance solely based on the aforementioned preliminary figures and the company’s position as a major player in the genomics space. So, investors have to wait till May 3 to gain an insight into the actual first-quarter figures of the company. Illumina currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy).Other favorably ranked stocks in the medical sector are..." http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/213749/illumina-ilmn-bleak-q1-preliminary-results-hurt-stock?cid=CS-SEEKAPH-FT-213749&source=sa Illumina's stock heads for biggest-ever price drop after revenue warning Published: Apr 19, 2016 "Illumina Inc.'s stock ILMN, -23.55% plunged in heavy volume in morning trade Tuesday, putting it on track to suffer the biggest one-day price loss in the 16 years since it went public..." http://www.marketwatch.com/story/illuminas-stock-heads-for-biggest-ever-price-drop-after-revenue-warning-2016-04-19 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
longlake95 Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 Not totally sure, but I think I remember reading a piece about Zacks. It mentioned zacks article are computer generated. I totally ignore them. LL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KinAlberta Posted April 30, 2016 Author Share Posted April 30, 2016 It's disheartening how much 'news' is being generated on every little company and every little price movement. Just clutters up the news streams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KinAlberta Posted March 29, 2017 Author Share Posted March 29, 2017 Here's a couple Zacks generated stories on shares I owned in the early 2000s and periodically check in on. Eight days and a few pennies movement in the stock and no other operational news that I could see yet Zacks flips back and forth... just like my post here - it's all more clutter. :-) Absolute Software (ALSWF) Cut to “Sell” at Zacks Investment Research Posted by Lucas Kauffman on Mar 24th, 2017 Absolute Software (NASDAQ:ALSWF) was downgraded by Zacks Investment Research from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a report issued on Friday. https://www.chaffeybreeze.com/2017/03/24/absolute-software-alswf-cut-to-sell-at-zacks-investment-research.html Absolute Software (ALSWF) Upgraded at Zacks Investment Research Posted by Joanna Charbonneau on Mar 16th, 2017 Absolute Software (NASDAQ:ALSWF) from a sell rating to a hold rating in a research report sent to investors on Monday morning. https://www.chaffeybreeze.com/2017/03/24/absolute-software-alswf-cut-to-sell-at-zacks-investment-research.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregmal Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Zacks is trash. No value to it. Their analyst work is an automated script. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DooDiligence Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 Who relies on a frozen yogurt company for investment advice? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now